[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] samba: fix dependencies and QA issues
Jens Rehsack
rehsack at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 20:20:41 UTC 2015
> Am 11.11.2015 um 20:48 schrieb Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 11.11.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In this special case I intend to say no, because:
>>>>
>>>> The lsb support is limited to startup only - and the distro features
>>>> controlling startup are "sysvinit" and "systemd", respectively.
>>>>
>>>> Mixing systemd with linuxstdbase in overrides is possible but installing
>>>> two init-script not knowing each other is likely asking for trouble. Maybe
>>>> I'm wrong with that :)
>>>
>>> and only sysvinit is valid for LSB, if you use systemd then lsb is
>>> violated anyway
>>> you can encode that logic for completion if you want
>>
>> Currently I'd like not to complicate things before jethro :)
>>
>> When you have an example somewhere how it can be sanely done, and it's easily
>> adopted - I'm happy to send an update for that. Otherwise I intend to wait
>> after release and take the patch as it is to fix remaining issues before
>> release is done.
>
> jethro announcement went out yesterday so ..
>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2015-November/027342.html
Cool - so it's shipped with a 3 month known bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8127 ... anyway ;)
So, do you have an example around how to reasonable add your suggestion to check for lsb override?
Cheers
--
Jens Rehsack - rehsack at gmail.com
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list