[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/3] samba: fix dependencies and QA issues

Jens Rehsack rehsack at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 20:20:41 UTC 2015


> Am 11.11.2015 um 20:48 schrieb Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 11.11.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jens Rehsack <rehsack at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In this special case I intend to say no, because:
>>>> 
>>>> The lsb support is limited to startup only - and the distro features
>>>> controlling startup are "sysvinit" and "systemd", respectively.
>>>> 
>>>> Mixing systemd with linuxstdbase in overrides is possible but installing
>>>> two init-script not knowing each other is likely asking for trouble. Maybe
>>>> I'm wrong with that :)
>>> 
>>> and only sysvinit is valid for LSB, if you use systemd then lsb is
>>> violated anyway
>>> you can encode that logic for completion if you want
>> 
>> Currently I'd like not to complicate things before jethro :)
>> 
>> When you have an example somewhere how it can be sanely done, and it's easily
>> adopted - I'm happy to send an update for that. Otherwise I intend to wait
>> after release and take the patch as it is to fix remaining issues before
>> release is done.
> 
> jethro announcement went out yesterday so ..
> 
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2015-November/027342.html

Cool - so it's shipped with a 3 month known bug https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8127 ... anyway ;)

So, do you have an example around how to reasonable add your suggestion to check for lsb override?

Cheers
-- 
Jens Rehsack - rehsack at gmail.com




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list