[oe] [meta-xfce][PATCH] meta-xfce/layer: explicitly set networkmanager to NETWORK_MANAGER

[Martin Jansa]

Why not use VIRTUAL-RUNTIME variable like in other places? And if it's
needed by xfce4-power-manager, then why don't you add it to RDEPENDS there?

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Andreas Müller <
schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia at windriver.com>
> wrote:
> > The NETWORK_MANAGER is connman-gnome in oe-core by default,
> > which conflicts with networkmanager. And networkmanager is
> > required by xfce4-power-manager in meta-xfce. So we explicitly
> > set networkmanager to NETWORK_MANAGER for meta-xfce.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia at windriver.com>
> > ---
> >  meta-xfce/conf/layer.conf | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta-xfce/conf/layer.conf b/meta-xfce/conf/layer.conf
> > index 55bcef6..e38d85d 100644
> > --- a/meta-xfce/conf/layer.conf
> > +++ b/meta-xfce/conf/layer.conf
> > @@ -17,3 +17,6 @@ LAYERDEPENDS_xfce-layer += "openembedded-layer"
> >  LAYERDEPENDS_xfce-layer += "gnome-layer"
> >  LAYERDEPENDS_xfce-layer += "openembedded-layer"
> >  LAYERDEPENDS_xfce-layer += "meta-python"
> > +
> > +# It is required by xfce4-power-manager
> > +NETWORK_MANAGER = "networkmanager"
> > --
> I was wondering why I never needed such kind of patch and checked: In
> my layers It is only used in packagegroup-core-x11-sato.
>
> So I am fine with this patch but could you mention
> packagegroup-core-x11-sato in the commit message please.
>
> Andreas
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>