[oe] [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Martin Jansa]

We only need better commit message which starts with "gnome-panel*:"

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
> wrote:

> Perhaps it wasn't clear, I was agreeing with you ;) I'm not even sure we
> need
> to add a mapping for this.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Thursday 01 October 2015 00:08:00 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > Right now, it gives a warning during build.
> > Just because some think we should support both, it does not mean we have
> to
> > *use* both. Applying the patch should fix the warning message, which
> should
> > be priority one.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Ulf Samuelsson
> >
> > > 30 sep 2015 kl. 13:58 skrev Paul Eggleton <
> paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com>:
> > >
> > > Yes I'm aware of that. What I was pointing out is that usually we have
> an
> > > SPDXLICENSEMAP setting to map e.g. GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0; there is no such
> > > mapping for GFDL; I guess the assumption was that there was.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 13:53:08 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > >> There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory
> > >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --- ------ openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL*
> > >>
> > >> GFDL-1.1  GFDL-1.2  GFDL-1.3
> > >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --- ------
> > >>
> > >> It does not make sense to have a duplicate file.
> > >>
> > >> Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the
> 1.1
> > >> license.
> > >>
> > >> /Ulf
> > >>
> > >>> Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton:
> > >>>> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf at emagii.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
> > >>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IIRC both are correct
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it
> > >>> won't
> > >>> be being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>