[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 1/6] llvm: update 3.5.2 to have a sane ARM JIT for OpenJDK-8

[Martin Jansa]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:48:51PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> 
> llvm introduced new JIT technology MCJIT with llvm 3.4 and fixes ARM in 3.5
> (see http://llvm.org/releases/3.5.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#changes-to-the-arm-backend).
> 
> Ensure JIT is built with llvm

I'm tempted to leave this one after jethro is branched, unless
default LLVM_RELEASE is updated in oe-core/jethro mesa as well.

Otherwise everybody will need to set LLVM_RELASE in their mesa bbappend
or we'll need to bbappend it in meta-oe.

What others think?

And was this tested with mesa or just with java?

Regards,

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <sno at netbsd.org>
> ---
>  meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/llvm.inc                 |  8 +---
>  ...r-output-from-configure-if-CFLAGS-is-set-.patch | 52 ----------------------
>  .../{llvm3.3 => llvm3.5}/arm_fenv_uclibc.patch     |  0
>  .../llvm/{llvm3.3_3.3.bb => llvm3.5_3.5.2.bb}      | 11 +++--
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/llvm3.3/Remove-error-output-from-configure-if-CFLAGS-is-set-.patch
>  rename meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/{llvm3.3 => llvm3.5}/arm_fenv_uclibc.patch (100%)
>  rename meta-oe/recipes-core/llvm/{llvm3.3_3.3.bb => llvm3.5_3.5.2.bb} (71%)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20151021/cf670323/attachment-0002.sig>