[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 4/4] openjdk-8: add recipes for openjdk-8 and openjre-8

[Jens Rehsack]

> Am 29.10.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Richard Leitner <richard.leitner at skidata.com>:
> 
> On 10/28/2015 07:01 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>> This adds openjdk-8 for native and target builds and allows a stripped
>> openjre-8 being built as well instead of trying to cherry-pick jre
>> components from jdk-image.
>> 
>> The recipes allow building openjdk-8 with or without:
>> * x11
>> * cups
>> * alsa/pulseaudio
>> and let packager enable unlimited-crypto, if desired.
>> 
>> Since there can be only one PROVIDES for virtual/java-native and virtual/javac-native,
>> move the provides to openjdk-8-native (I think everyone agrees it's a better
>> choice than ecj-bootstrap-native).
>> 
>> Plus: Applying a fix from openjdk-9 repository which fixes build issues using gcc5
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Rehsack <sno at netbsd.org>
>> ---
>> README                                             |   13 +-
>> recipes-core/cacao/cacao_1.6.1.bb                  |    2 +-
>> recipes-core/ecj/ecj-bootstrap-native.bb           |    2 -
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/LICENSE       |  347 +++
>> .../dont-expect-fqpn-for-make.patch                |   18 +
>> .../openjdk-8-72b00/filter-aclocal-copy-too.patch  |   11 +
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/jvm.cfg       |   41 +
>> .../openjdk8-find-compiler-fix-env-respect.patch   |  140 +
>> .../openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-fix-shark-build.patch |  453 ++++
>> .../openjdk8-fix-shark-stdc++11.patch              | 2730 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../openjdk8-no-genx11-in-headless.patch           |   17 +
>> .../openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-no-unused-deps.patch  |   94 +
>> ...o-in-favour-of-openembedded-package-split.patch |  120 +
>> .../openjdk8-restrict-to-staging-dir.patch         |   11 +
>> ..._than_returning_address_of_local_variable.patch |   23 +
>> .../remove-shell-variables-from-autoheader.patch   |   31 +
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-common.inc          |  229 ++
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-cross.inc           |  202 ++
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native.inc          |   63 +
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native_72b00.bb     |   16 +
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-release-72b00.inc   |   89 +
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_72b00.bb            |   36 +
>> recipes-core/openjdk/openjre-8_72b00.bb            |   30 +
>> 23 files changed, 4706 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/LICENSE
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/dont-expect-fqpn-for-make.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/filter-aclocal-copy-too.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/jvm.cfg
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-find-compiler-fix-env-respect.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-fix-shark-build.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-fix-shark-stdc++11.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-no-genx11-in-headless.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-no-unused-deps.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-prevent-debuginfo-in-favour-of-openembedded-package-split.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-restrict-to-staging-dir.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/openjdk8-use_builtin_frame_address_0_rather_than_returning_address_of_local_variable.patch
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-72b00/remove-shell-variables-from-autoheader.patch
> 
> IMHO a version independent patches directory like for openjdk-7 would
> also be good here.
> 
> To cite Otavio:
> We could rename the patches directory for openjdk-7 and avoid the
> version number on it. This would make easier for upgrades and to see
> the diff between the patches.

So git diff -M doesn't work for you? I don't understand the reasoning.

>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-common.inc
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-cross.inc
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native.inc
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-native_72b00.bb
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8-release-72b00.inc
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_72b00.bb
>> create mode 100644 recipes-core/openjdk/openjre-8_72b00.bb
> 
> Furthermore I had problems building OpenJDK-7 with this patch applied.
> But I will verify that again and come back to you!

Yes, please :)

I'm sorry that I cannot verify on own, because OpenJDK-7 still requires X11
and I have no X11 available in my distro and not enough resources to create
a playground for such things :(

But with sane errors I'm happy to dig and fix.

Cheers
-- 
Jens Rehsack - rehsack at gmail.com