[oe] meta-openembedded patchwork git hook

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:30:09AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:41:20PM -0600, Jose Lamego wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 11/29/2016 07:50 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > 
> > >> On Nov 29, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Jose Lamego <jose.a.lamego at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 11/29/2016 02:43 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:52:46AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Martin just brought to my attention that the git hook for the 
> > >>>> meta-openembedded repository that's supposed to update patchwork still isn't 
> > >>>> working and hasn't done so for a very long time. I thought we'd fixed this so 
> > >>>> that merged patches get marked as "Accepted", but at least for meta-
> > >>>> openembedded it seems like that's not the case.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jose / Michael - can you look into this if you haven't already? Please let me 
> > >>>> know if you need any help.
> > >>
> > >> The git hook was configured to update OE-core only, Michael will help us
> > >> to include meta-openembedded.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > There are more repos using patchwork beyond OE-core and meta-opemebedded
> > > please enable it for all of them  as well.
> > > 
> > 
> > Now all of the projects are enabled to receive automatic updates from
> > the git-hook (Thanks Michael). Please let me know if any undesired
> > behavior is detected.
> 
> Still doesn't mark anything as accepted:
> 
> OE @ ~/meta-openembedded $ git push origin master
> Counting objects: 293, done.
> Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
> Compressing objects: 100% (257/257), done.
> Writing objects: 100% (293/293), 48.83 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done.
> Total 293 (delta 179), reused 68 (delta 18)
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev efd3696e70a6603f1a45faa4a172433514f0a487.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 8c720146b718aae3bc194621f3e095cf11ecb2ed.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev fc2fc9097b2fa437d4af0338e418692b4dd6c989.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 533826b7652a2cf86ca7b665c25b98c89afc266e.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 6afb85d29286aaa4cdd892460f6adf68912917a5.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev a7f3ec87f957ff35b8a853cd0e04c6b18bac0ece.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 877e52fd75c7d3b88add94691df3beb5e0c54529.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 2f6e45baba961629bfe023599144be6cfcd45728.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 86fed80d80bc33f0a3cdbf719c00ee5f05ed4d19.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 41d7bac5d50091cab835eac0a5eaa6c431fb2023.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev a85e12928131fce057f777daa76a7f0c75cffa14.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 45837e6c567b1b9ff9d152a7e2a752488d313455.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 119e75e48dbf0539b4e440417901458ffff79b38.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev a4251575f41fa5aafe5072e562497b05c11b6702.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev b6ea2c0bacb21b83bae3605ef4da080de0cad15e.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 4580e5ae201b320ed407eae26f58655b8768b387.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev c476219e845934f767927e81fe60dbaa157df9ee.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 0288b204f3c12af1561218fa0cfcdfb9a5508b47.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 5596b52d64c30d8e66ec6e379cf69a9fc9407fb1.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev 24e51a6a106bc10a8838b23e4bf9ea6304314bca.
> remote: E: failed to find patch for rev aac6bf8bf911c3f14ff9dce08f0f011838f5a426.
> remote: I: 0 patch(es) updated to state Accepted.
> remote: Sending notification emails to: openembedded-commits at lists.openembedded.org.
> To git.openembedded.org:meta-openembedded
>    761639b..aac6bf8  master -> master

I don't know how far apart the freedesktop.org one is from ozlabs but
when I was seeing that problem locally as part of what I was working on
it was because of some missing host deps (that are now not required).
FWIW you can pretty easily turn the hook into a script to run manually
and sh -x it to see _why_ it's not hashing out those patches.

-- 
Tom