[oe] linux-yocto issues Was: [meta-oe][PATCH] efivar: fix zero initializer compiler error

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 10:45:27 UTC 2016


On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:24:03AM +0200, Alexandru But wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 07:01:57PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:45:18PM +0200, Alexandru But wrote:
> > > Patch based on commit a3606c0:
> > > Sometimes the compiler doesn't like { 0,} as an initializer
> > 
> > Probably not caused by this change, but efivar now fails to build in
> > world build for qemuarm:
> > 
> > | linux.c: In function 'eb_nvme_ns_id':
> > | linux.c:48:27: error: 'NVME_IOCTL_ID' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > |   uint64_t ret = ioctl(fd, NVME_IOCTL_ID, NULL);
> > |                            ^
> > | linux.c:48:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > | make[1]: *** [linux.o] Error 1
> > | make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/tmp-glibc/work/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi/efivar/0.21-r0/git/src'
> > | make: *** [src] Error 2
> > | ERROR: oe_runmake failed
> > | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at /home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/tmp-glibc/work/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi/efivar/0.21-r0/temp/log.do_compile.8376)
> > NOTE: recipe efivar-0.21-r0: task do_compile: Failed
> > ERROR: Task 5672 (/home/jenkins/oe/world/shr-core/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar_0.21.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1'
> > 
> 
> Yes, I saw the error, and indeed is not related to this change. The problem is
> that NVMe uapi header was renamed from nvme.h to nvme_ioctl.h. Here is the
> change:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9d99a8dda154f38307d43d9c9aa504bd3703d596
> 
> The Kconfig update unfortunately hasn't been change in the same time. It was
> commited to the kernel only recently and will most likely be present in 4.5.
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a9cf8284b45110a4d98aea180a89c857e53bf850
> 
> In the standard/base repository that yocto uses, only the first of the above
> changes have been pulled. The old header has a new name, so the desired macro
> is no longer there. The problem could be solved from the utility point of view
> with a patch that gentoo tree already has:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-libs/efivar/files/0.21-nvme_ioctl.h.patch
> 
> The problem is that even with this change the new header will not be found since
> the second change is not yet in the yocto repo. I cherry-picked and created all
> the changes above, but efivar still does not find the new header.
> Problem is that the headers from sysroot are built by linux-libc-headers and
> this recipe uses the static 4.4 linux release archive from kernel.org. If all
> the above are pulled in and linux-libc-headers are using sources with both
> changes, than efivar build will pass.
> 
> From my point of view the possible solutions for this problem are:
> - Push the efivar patch and blacklist the recipe until linux-libc-headers points
>   to 4.5
> - Revert the rename change in the yocto kernel repo and apply the efivar patch
>   after 4.5 token
> - Apply the efivar patch, and a patch for linux-libc-headers
> - Escalate the problem to the kernel comunity to backport the Kconfig change to
>   4.4
> 
> I am not sure which is the right approach since they all have downsides.

Thanks for detailed analysis, I don't use efivar or linux-yocto, so I
was reporting the issue only because I wasn't able to even build-test
your change in jenkins.

Adding oe-core and Bruce, because the issue is in
linux-yocto/linux-libc-headers maintained there.

Regards,

> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru But <alexandru.but at ni.com>
> > > ---
> > >  ...he-compiler-doesn-t-like-0-as-an-initiali.patch | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar_0.21.bb     |  3 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar/0001-Sometimes-the-compiler-doesn-t-like-0-as-an-initiali.patch
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar/0001-Sometimes-the-compiler-doesn-t-like-0-as-an-initiali.patch b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar/0001-Sometimes-the-compiler-doesn-t-like-0-as-an-initiali.patch
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..68cabd6
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar/0001-Sometimes-the-compiler-doesn-t-like-0-as-an-initiali.patch
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> > > +From a3606c02fd271d32e364fcc540e34ba1899309f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > +From: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>
> > > +Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:33:54 -0400
> > > +Subject: [PATCH] Sometimes the compiler doesn't like { 0, } as an
> > > + initializer...
> > > +
> > > +Because it really wants to be { {0, },} or something, and sometimes the
> > > +compiler, knowing full well what we're trying to do, likes to complain
> > > +about the rigor applied to our technique in doing it.
> > > +
> > > +memset() the struct ifreq to 0 instead so I don't need to figure out its
> > > +internal structure just to zero it out.
> > > +
> > > +Resolves #28
> > > +
> > > +Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com>
> > > +---
> > > + src/linux.c | 3 ++-
> > > + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > +
> > > +diff --git a/src/linux.c b/src/linux.c
> > > +index 57f71f3..817b8e6 100644
> > > +--- a/src/linux.c
> > > ++++ b/src/linux.c
> > > +@@ -847,12 +847,13 @@ ssize_t
> > > + __attribute__((__visibility__ ("hidden")))
> > > + make_mac_path(uint8_t *buf, ssize_t size, const char * const ifname)
> > > + {
> > > +-	struct ifreq ifr = { 0, };
> > > ++	struct ifreq ifr;
> > > + 	struct ethtool_drvinfo drvinfo = { 0, };
> > > + 	int fd, rc;
> > > + 	ssize_t ret = -1, sz, off=0;
> > > + 	char busname[PATH_MAX+1] = "";
> > > + 
> > > ++	memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof (ifr));
> > > + 	strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, ifname, IF_NAMESIZE);
> > > + 	drvinfo.cmd = ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO;
> > > + 	ifr.ifr_data = (caddr_t)&drvinfo;
> > > +-- 
> > > +2.6.1
> > > +
> > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar_0.21.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar_0.21.bb
> > > index b5ef90a..1684a10 100644
> > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar_0.21.bb
> > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-extended/efivar/efivar_0.21.bb
> > > @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=6626bb1e20189cfa95f2c508ba286393"
> > >  DEPENDS_class-target = "popt efivar-native"
> > >  
> > >  SRCREV = "aab6c2a64d90b6e5a63661fb5bd6be8d878b0784"
> > > -SRC_URI = "git://github.com/rhinstaller/efivar.git"
> > > +SRC_URI = "git://github.com/rhinstaller/efivar.git \
> > > +           file://0001-Sometimes-the-compiler-doesn-t-like-0-as-an-initiali.patch"
> > >  SRC_URI_append_class-target = " file://0001-efivar-fix-for-cross-compile.patch"
> > >  SRC_URI_append_class-native = " file://efivar-drop-options-not-supported-by-lower-version-gcc.patch"
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.6.1
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> > 
> > -- 
> > Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> > -- 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20160201/6380ee89/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list