[oe] [OE-core] OE Changelog since 2016-05-15 until 2016-05-22

[Andreas Müller]

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2016 22:18:34 Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Paul Eggleton
>>
>> <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 26 May 2016 13:46:21 Cliff Brake wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Maxin B. John <maxin.john at intel.com>
> wrote:
>> >> > meta-java repo was moved to:
>> >> > git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-java
>> >> >
>> >> > Is it possible to update the list with that info?
>> >>
>> >> Done, thanks!
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/cbrake/openembedded-admin/commit/51604da79ed5a02341562
>> >> a9b f254b3dd9dc71704
>> >
>> > At some point it would be great if this script could be driven from the OE
>> > layer index rather than being a separate entity - then updates would
>> > largely be self-service for the maintainers, or at least they would only
>> > need to be done in one place.
>>
>> Maybe a bit off-topic but layer index should have some mechanism of
>> removing rotten layers.
>
> We've discussed this on-and-off at OE developer meetings for a while now. FWIW
> I can remove them manually - actually I just got around to deleting meta-
> picosam9 which has been unmaintained for years.
>
> Part of the problem though is determining what "rotten" actually means.
> Additionally, there's an element of leaving things around in case someone
> comes to fork/revive them again. We do show a "last updated" date but it would
> be good to figure out some other way of determining and indicating "layer
> health" - to date I don't think we've managed to figure out anything practical
> for that.
>
At least meta-kf5 is a candidate. I think it has never worked and
meta-qt5-extra is (try give my best) - maintained.

What about meta-kde4?

Andreas