[oe] chromium detected as stripped

[Andreas Müller]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Andreas Müller
<schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jussi Kukkonen
> <jussi.kukkonen at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I chatted with rakuco who's done nice work with up to date chromium in
>> meta-crosswalk, he's got some relevant commits related to this:
>>
>> https://github.com/rakuco/meta-crosswalk/commit/5aae1539c3d62b295dba40f494397c0797140b0f
>> https://github.com/rakuco/meta-crosswalk/commit/c56aa2bf047d3a01e14f4f9bfe5f88664b333f36
>>
>> On a related note, this good work is currently a bit hidden in
>> meta-crosswalk -- is there a chance we could get this combined with
>> meta-browser (or whatever place makes sense)? I know next to nothing about
>> chromium packaging so CCing Raphael and the meta-browser maintainers for
>> comments.
>>
> That is interesting. If your suspicion is correct, we are very close
> to the edge of file working properly or not. With meta-browser
> c79cf6c7811afd2cd167e8967e3c29b1e797371e (16 commits behind master) I
> get a proper detected and then split chromium. With meta-browser
> master head file incorrectly reports that chrome is split already. I
> did not check the exact size numbers but my file browser reports 4.3G
> for both cases.
>
> Just to gather further information I think about bisecting meta-browser.
>
After first bisect build I checked size:: 4299018288 bytes / 2^32 is
4294967296 - so no need for further bisecting. Thanks Jussi for the
hint.

For now I'll choose old version - have not much time to take care.

Andreas