[oe] [PATCH] [meta-networking][PATCH] packagegroup-samba: new add

[Andreas Oberritter]

Hi Zheng,

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:33:07 +0800
zhengrq <zhengrq.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Add packagegroup for samba, for there are too many rpms in samba and it's hard to manage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin <zhengrq.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  .../packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb
> 
> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6177691
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/packagegroups/packagegroup-samba.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +SUMMARY = "samba package groups"
> +PV = "1.0"
> +PR = "r2"
> +
> +inherit packagegroup
> +
> +PROVIDES = "${PACKAGES}"
> +PACKAGES = "${PN}-server ${PN}-client ${PN}-ctdb-tests ${PN}-pidl"
> +
> +SUMMARY_${PN}-client = " samba client"
> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-client = "\
> +    smbclient \
> +    samba-common \
> +    winbind \
> +    registry-tools \
> +    "

Why don't you just create a samba-client meta package inside
the samba recipe instead?

> +
> +SUMMARY_${PN}-server = " samba server"
> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-server = "\
> +    samba \
> +    samba-common \
> +    "

All samba libraries already depend on samba-common, so samba depends on it
indirectly. Therefore this "package group" doesn't seem to be necessary.

> +
> +SUMMARY_${PN}-ctdb-tests = " samba ctdb-tests"
> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-ctdb-tests = "samba-ctdb-tests"
> +
> +SUMMARY_${PN}-pidl = "samba-pidl"
> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-pidl = "samba-pidl"

These two seem to be unnecessary, too.

Regards,
Andreas