[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent

[MacDonald, Joe]

Yeah.  If you're near a keyboard, please go ahead and revert otherwise I'll get to in later on tonight.

On Feb 24, 2017 5:01 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
Joe?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com<mailto:schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Szombathelyi György <gyurco at freemail.hu<mailto:gyurco at freemail.hu>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If there&#39;s no solution to resolve the conflict between the internal tevent and the external one, then maybe putting the libtevent-internal.h from the external lib to the samba tree would be a way to go.
>
> Br,
> György
> -------- Eredeti levél --------
> Feladó: Andreas Müller &lt;schnitzeltony&#64;googlemail.com<http://googlemail.com>&gt;
> Dátum: 2017 február 20 12:52:18
> Tárgy: Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent
> Címzett: openembedded-devel&#64;lists.openembedded.org<http://lists.openembedded.org> &lt;openembedded-devel&#64;lists.openembedded.org<http://lists.openembedded.org>&gt;
>
> &gt; In last build I&#39;ve noticed only this new issue related to samba:
> &gt;
> &gt; ctdb-2.5.6: ctdb rdepends on samba, but it isn&#39;t a build dependency, missing samba in DEPENDS or PACKAGECONFIG? [build-deps]
> &gt;
> &gt; Maybe this dependency was created from samba being libldb provider in
> &gt; this build.
> &gt;
> &gt; gvfs and whole meta-gnome layers is still included in my world, maybe it
> &gt; didn&#39;t fail because some gvfs dependency was already failing or one of
> &gt; samba related changes in master-next is fixing this one.
> &gt;
> Some background: During last weekend I prepared a series based on
> master-next unblacklisting. First target is to build a xfce-image
> again [1]. Last step yesterday evening should be rebasing against
> latest master-next and run a test build. That failed for gvfs - so I
> stopped sending stuff. Now I know why gvfs fails...
>
> How do we proceed with this patch?
>
> [1] https://github.com/schnitzeltony/meta-openembedded/tree/work-2017-02
>
Just notices that this patch made it into master breaking at least gvfs. Revert?

Andreas
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org<mailto:Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org>
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel