[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent

Joe MacDonald Joe_MacDonald at mentor.com
Mon Feb 27 13:29:30 UTC 2017


[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent] On 17.02.25 (Sat 09:20) Martin Jansa wrote:

> > My builds without gvfs are still happy, but reverting the patch
> > breaks all builds
> 
> What gets broken? When I removed this change from master-next after
> Andreas's report I haven't seen any new issue and the gvfs one was
> indeed fixed after that.
> 
> I'll include revert at least in master-next to see what it does with
> next bitbake world.

The failure wasn't specifically an error, it was a ton of QA warnings
about missing providers for libtevent.  After abandoning the previous
build and starting fresh, as the autobuilder would, it seems okay with
the revert, so we'll go with that approach.

-J.

> 
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Joe MacDonald <Joe_MacDonald at mentor.com>
> wrote:
> 
>     [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in libtevent] On
>     17.02.24 (Fri 22:33) MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> 
>     > Yeah.  If you're near a keyboard, please go ahead and revert otherwise
>     > I'll get to in later on tonight.
> 
>     Bah.  This isn't just the revert I'd been hoping for.  Samba, as usual,
>     is a pain.  My builds without gvfs are still happy, but reverting the
>     patch breaks all builds, AFAICT, so I'm going to leave this alone until
>     I sort out what the correct repair job looks like here.  Unless someone
>     comes up with a solution before I get to it.  The weekend is rather full
>     right now, I'm afraid.
> 
>     -J.
>    
>     >
>     > On Feb 24, 2017 5:01 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
>     > Joe?
>     >
>     > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Andreas Müller <
>     schnitzeltony at googlemail.com<mailto:schnitzeltony at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>     > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Szombathelyi György <gyurco at freemail.hu
>     <mailto:gyurco at freemail.hu>> wrote:
>     > > Hi,
>     > >
>     > > If there&#39;s no solution to resolve the conflict between the internal
>     tevent and the external one, then maybe putting the libtevent-internal.h
>     from the external lib to the samba tree would be a way to go.
>     > >
>     > > Br,
>     > > György
>     > > -------- Eredeti levél --------
>     > > Feladó: Andreas Müller &lt;schnitzeltony&#64;googlemail.com<http://
>     googlemail.com>&gt;
>     > > Dátum: 2017 február 20 12:52:18
>     > > Tárgy: Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH v2] Samba: use built-in
>     libtevent
>     > > Címzett: openembedded-devel&#64;lists.openembedded.org<http://lists.
>     openembedded.org> &lt;openembedded-devel&#64;lists.openembedded.org<http://
>     lists.openembedded.org>&gt;
>     > >
>     > > &gt; In last build I&#39;ve noticed only this new issue related to
>     samba:
>     > > &gt;
>     > > &gt; ctdb-2.5.6: ctdb rdepends on samba, but it isn&#39;t a build
>     dependency, missing samba in DEPENDS or PACKAGECONFIG? [build-deps]
>     > > &gt;
>     > > &gt; Maybe this dependency was created from samba being libldb provider
>     in
>     > > &gt; this build.
>     > > &gt;
>     > > &gt; gvfs and whole meta-gnome layers is still included in my world,
>     maybe it
>     > > &gt; didn&#39;t fail because some gvfs dependency was already failing
>     or one of
>     > > &gt; samba related changes in master-next is fixing this one.
>     > > &gt;
>     > > Some background: During last weekend I prepared a series based on
>     > > master-next unblacklisting. First target is to build a xfce-image
>     > > again [1]. Last step yesterday evening should be rebasing against
>     > > latest master-next and run a test build. That failed for gvfs - so I
>     > > stopped sending stuff. Now I know why gvfs fails...
>     > >
>     > > How do we proceed with this patch?
>     > >
>     > > [1] https://github.com/schnitzeltony/meta-openembedded/tree/
>     work-2017-02
>     > >
>     > Just notices that this patch made it into master breaking at least gvfs.
>     Revert?
>     >
>     > Andreas
>     > --
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Openembedded-devel mailing list
>     > Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org<mailto:Openem
>     bedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org>
>     > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>     >
>     >
>     --
>     -Joe MacDonald.
>     :wq
> 
> 

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20170227/05865399/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list