[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH 1/1] mdns: move from meta-intel-iot-middleware

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree with Khem, I've merged oprofile even when it fails with musl,
> > because that was the main reason for moving it from oe-core to meta-oe, but
> > we don't want to burden Khem with more new musl issues when they are
> > detected soon enough (my world builds don't use musl, so I depend on Khem to
> > provide feedback when he can) .
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis at denix.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:19:25PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Paul Eggleton
> >> >> <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >> > The following improvements have been made over the recipe that was in
> >> >> > meta-intel-iot-middleware (a layer which is no longer actively
> >> >> > maintained):
> >> >> >
> >> >> > * Upgrade to latest upstream version (765.50.9)
> >> >> > * Fix compilation failures by passing CC and LD
> >> >> > * Fix "no GNU hash in the ELF binary" issue
> >> >> > * Point S at the correct source subdirectory so that "make clean"
> >> >> > works
> >> >> > * Fix lack of soname on libdns_sd.so leading to missing RDEPENDS QA
> >> >> > error
> >> >> > * Add SUMMARY
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This has been accepted into master but it fails to build with musl
> >> >
> >> > Is musl a requirement for meta-oe?
> >>
> >> We have fixed it to a point where we have around 10-12 recipes which
> >> don't compile
> >> with musl, and it would be better to keep this level as such and
> >> especially when we
> >> know its failing. its a requirement for oe-core
> 
> I do world builds on master-next with musl on qemumips and rpi3
> continuously, with a known set of failures, if a new one shows up
> I tend to report.

Ok, no problem, it's just demanding someone new, submitting a patch/recipe, to 
go fix musl, which they probably never heard of, would result in never hearing 
from them again. :)

Anyway, I'll look into getting some musl coverage for my submission as well...

-- 
Denys