[oe] mesa-gl build failing for RPi0

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Fri Oct 27 21:47:00 UTC 2017


On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Scott Ellis <scott at jumpnowtek.com> wrote:
> Using rocko
>
> ...
> | glsl/.libs/libstandalone.a(libmesautil_la-disk_cache.o): In function `evict_lru_item':
> | /usr/src/debug/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/mesa-17.1.7/src/util/disk_cache.c:615: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8'
> | glsl/.libs/libstandalone.a(libmesautil_la-disk_cache.o): In function `cache_put':
> | /usr/src/debug/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/mesa-17.1.7/src/util/disk_cache.c:886: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8'
> | glsl/.libs/libstandalone.a(libmesautil_la-disk_cache.o): In function `disk_cache_remove':
> | /usr/src/debug/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/mesa-17.1.7/src/util/disk_cache.c:637: undefined reference to `__atomic_fetch_add_8'
> | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> | Makefile:2076: recipe for target 'glsl_compiler' failed
> | make[4]: *** [glsl_compiler] Error 1
> | make[4]: Leaving directory '/oe4/rocko/tmp-rocko/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/build/src/compiler'
> | Makefile:1528: recipe for target 'all' failed
> | make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
> | make[3]: Leaving directory '/oe4/rocko/tmp-rocko/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/build/src/compiler'
> | Makefile:840: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
> | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> | make[2]: Leaving directory '/oe4/rocko/tmp-rocko/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/build/src'
> | Makefile:631: recipe for target 'all' failed
> | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> | make[1]: Leaving directory '/oe4/rocko/tmp-rocko/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-poky-linux-gnueabi/mesa-gl/2_17.1.7-r0/build/src'
> | Makefile:631: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
> | make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed
>
>
> The solution used for armv5 boards in mesa.inc works for armv6
>
>   CFLAGS_append_armv6 = " -DMISSING_64BIT_ATOMICS"
>

isn't rpi0 based on armv6k for which 64bit atomics should be fine.
are we using wrong tune files ?

>
> I'm using it in a private layer bbappend, but might belong
> in mesa.inc alongside the armv5 line.
>
>
> Some discussion of the bug here
>
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874531
>
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list