[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/2] Add a couple of MQTT support recipes

[Andrea Galbusera]

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
> wrote:

> On Friday, 1 September 2017 6:03:52 PM NZST Andrea Galbusera wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Tim Orling <
> timothy.t.orling at linux.intel.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:02 PM, Paul Eggleton <
> > > paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Add a couple of recipes from meta-intel-iot-middleware to support
> MQTT.
> > > > Since the meta-intel-iot-middleware layer isn't being actively
> > > > maintained and these aren't in any way Intel-specific I figured they
> > > > ought to be brought up-to-date and moved somewhere that people can
> more
> > > > easily reuse them.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for this. It has been a concern of mine and this is a welcome
> > > solution.
> >
> >
> > Good news for me also! FWIW months ago there used to be a more recent
> > version of meta-intel-iot-middleware hosted on github as part of Ostro.
> > Since this was confusing to me I asked [1] on the list to clarify
> > maintenance status and relationships between the two things, but only
> got a
> > reply [2] from a former maintainer of the repo on yoctoproject.org.
> Anyway
> > I agree that having MQTT recipes in meta-oe will help! Thanks Paul for
> > that!
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/2016-December/
> 004462.html
> > [2]
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-intel/2017-
> January/004488.html
>
> No worries. I see you were after these two recipes and hiredis (and the
> latter
> is in meta-oe now as you probably know).
>

Yes! I'm currently using hiredis from meta-oe in a couple of projects now
and I'm more than happy to have it there! ;-)


>
> The recipes that aren't either obsolete or available elsewhere are as
> follows:
>
> hid-api
> libstrophe
> libwyliodrin
> mdns
> python-pyfirmata
> sshpass
> tempered
> wyliodrin-server
>
> Only python-pyfirmata looks particularly interesting to me, but if there
> are
> others that anyone would like preserved/updated please let me know.
>

None of them are of particular interest to me a.t.m, but thanks again for
in-depth auditing that layer.