[oe] [PATCH 29/31] xfce4-mixer: Remove, gstreamer-0.10 is obsolete

[Andreas Müller]

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle at windriver.com> wrote:
>
> You are missing the point.  We DO need a replacement.  However, I was unable to
> find one.  With the few references I found when searching that there was no
> replacement, and it was effectively obsolete (and removed in other
> distributions), I followed their example.
>
> As I said in the header, I don't believe this set is completely right.  But it's
> a first stab and what it took for me to pass the testing script.
>
> I am retesting with this patch and the removal of gstreamer removed from the
> test set (it will take a while, I've got -30,000- tasks to run through for a
> test).  It's possible that something else in the system was triggering a fault
> that caused gstreamer-0.10 to fail and that was resolved elsewhere.
>
> I tested the original work against master, but rebased to master-next after
> talking w/ Martin... I then spot checked the modified recipes that they were
> still working after the rebase.
>
>> And please don't even think about running your magic script for
>> meta-qt5-extra or send patches.
>
> Again, you are missing the point here.  Someone has to start this work.  It's
> the layer maintainers decision to accept or reject the patches, not mine..  but
> I feel it's my obligation as a community member to submit the patches I create
> to the community layers that I use.  I also feel it's my obligation as a patch
> submitter to explain why (or why not) they are necessary for my specific
> use-case.  (In this case, passing a specific compatibility test script.)
>
> --Mark
>
>> Over and out
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>
I am sure that I miss the point again but fedora - for me
reference/inspiration many times - has no problem with xfce4-mixer
[1].

[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfce4-mixer.git/tree/xfce4-mixer.spec

Andreas