[oe] [PATCH 1/1] lvm2: disable thin provisioning support if GPLv3 incompatible

[Andre McCurdy]

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:47 PM,  <kai.kang at windriver.com> wrote:
>> From: Kai Kang <kai.kang at windriver.com>
>>
>> Disable thin provisioning support for lvm2 if it is set GPLv3
>> incompatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang at windriver.com>
>> ---
>>  meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2.inc | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2.inc b/meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2.inc
>> index ab8db9cba..9791554a9 100644
>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2.inc
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2.inc
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ inherit autotools-brokensep pkgconfig systemd
>>  LVM2_PACKAGECONFIG = "dmeventd lvmetad"
>>  LVM2_PACKAGECONFIG_append_class-target = " \
>>      ${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'selinux', d)} \
>> -    thin-provisioning-tools \
>> +    ${@bb.utils.contains('INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE', 'GPLv3', '', 'thin-provisioning-tools', d)} \
>>      udev \
>>  "
> there are other strings like GPL-3.0, as well as other types of GPL 3
> derivative licenses, I wonder if this will work for all

Perhaps something like:

  ${@incompatible_license_contains('GPLv3', '', 'thin-provisioning-tools', d)}

would work more reliably?

> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel