[oe] [meta-handheld][PATCH] zaurusd: refresh patches (using devtool)

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:23:39AM +0200, Andrea Adami wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> > Op 10-04-18 om 23:01 schreef Andrea Adami:
> >> Silence warnings about ingnored context.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami at gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >> --- a/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch
> >> +++ b/recipes-bsp/zaurusd/zaurusd/0001-zaurusd-add-support-for-collie.patch
> >> @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
> >> -From 85b94bed1feab70bc529a59fb80c26da825b9abe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> +From 668a7bc50ca8f36df5a0eae73a5fa251aada9cc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>  From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
> >>  Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 16:00:10 +0400
> >>  Subject: [PATCH] zaurusd: add support for collie
> >> -Upstream-Status: Pending
> > Was that change intended?
> 
> No, not really.
> Let say I have spotted it and planned to read the devtool code...
> 
> I think it is tolerable in this context, because unfortunately not all
> patches have Upstream-Status.
> (I am wondering if there is still Upstream for zaurusd...)
> 
> So I have left the result unchanged., planning to update the
> Upstream-Status soon.

Related, but not exactly the same:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12674

Basically, in your case Upstream-status was above the empty line that 
separates patch header and patch description. Upstream-status should be 
in the patch description or it will be lost by devtool...

-- 
Denys