[oe] [meta-java][PATCH] openjdk-7: clarify a bitbake warning
Henning Heinold
henning at itconsulting-heinold.de
Mon Aug 13 15:53:13 UTC 2018
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Richard Leitner wrote:
> We get a bitbake warning during recipe building complaining about
> unsupported architectures unconditionally. That check is relevant
> only for shark builds, so it is quite confusing for non-shark
> builds.
>
> Make the warning conditional on whether shark builds are enabled
> or not.
>
> This is the same patch as the one for openjdk-8 by André Draszik
> (commit 86c729cb51f880fd5a1ec6485baddfa2bedaa998)
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner at skidata.com>
> ---
> recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-common.inc | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-common.inc b/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-common.inc
> index 816b463..c92af40 100644
> --- a/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-common.inc
> +++ b/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-common.inc
> @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ def get_llvm_configure_arch(d):
> elif arch == "powerpc" or arch == "powerpc64":
> arch = "powerpc"
> else:
> - bb.warn("%s does not support %s yet" % (d.getVar('PN', True), arch) );
> + if 'shark' in d.getVar('PACKAGECONFIG').split():
> + bb.warn("%s does not support %s in Shark builds yet" % (d.getVar('PN', True), arch) );
>
> return arch
>
> --
> 2.11.0
Looks good to me.
Bye Henning
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list