[oe] [meta-python][PATCH] pycrypto: Add recipe to have support on python3

[Tim Orling]

> On Jan 4, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Ricardo Silva <rjpdasilva at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The pycrypto module sources can be used for both python2 and python3,
> but a recipe for python3 was missing, so add it.
> 
> Recipe is basically the same as for python2 (python-pycrypto_2.6.1.bb),
> but using distutils3 instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Silva <rjpdasilva at gmail.com>
> ---
> .../recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycrypto_2.6.1.bb       | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycrypto_2.6.1.bb
> 
> diff --git a/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycrypto_2.6.1.bb b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycrypto_2.6.1.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..2878c8599
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycrypto_2.6.1.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +inherit distutils3
> +require python-pycrypto.inc
> +
> +SRC_URI += "file://cross-compiling.patch \
> +            file://CVE-2013-7459.patch \
> +

These will not be picked up as they are in "python-pycrypto" directory (not in “files” or “python3-pycrypto”, etc.). This will result in a fetcher failure.

Rather than duplicate the SRC_URI in both python2- and python3- recipes, we should add them to python-pycrypto.inc and add the following to python-pycrypto.inc

FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/python-pycrypto:”

>           "
> +
> +# We explicitly call distutils_do_install, since we want it to run, but
> +# *don't* want the autotools install to run, since this package doesn't
> +# provide a "make install" target.
> +do_install() {
> +       distutils3_do_install
> +}
> -- 
> 2.15.1
> 
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel