[oe] [networking] [PATCH 0/2] Move openwrt-upstream packages to meta-openwrt
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 20:46:11 UTC 2018
On 1/30/18 3:37 AM, cshored at thecshore.com wrote:
>
> ...01-rtnl_flush-Error-on-failed-write.patch | 34 ---------------
> .../relayd/relayd_git.bb | 17 --------
> .../libubox/0001-version-libraries.patch | 28 ------------
> .../libubox/libubox/fix-libdir.patch | 40 ------------------
> .../recipes-devtools/libubox/libubox_git.bb | 30 -------------
> 5 files changed, 149 deletions(-)
>
> libubox is probably uncontroversial and in fact was suggested by
> Khem Raj here: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2018-January/116565.html
>
> relayd I'm not as sure about as it's in meta-networking and there is
> the off chance it's actually in use. I'm open to opinions.
>
> In any event I'm updating meta-openwrt with the good things done in
> meta-openembedded, as well as other work to meake meta-openwrt
> more generally useful (for use as a hybrid with regular OE,
> as a more openwrt-built-with-OE distro, and as a pick the bits
> that make sense to you repo).
>
it does. Thanks for sending the patches.
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list