[oe] [networking] [PATCH 0/2] Move openwrt-upstream packages to meta-openwrt

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 20:46:11 UTC 2018


On 1/30/18 3:37 AM, cshored at thecshore.com wrote:
> 
>  ...01-rtnl_flush-Error-on-failed-write.patch | 34 ---------------
>  .../relayd/relayd_git.bb                     | 17 --------
>  .../libubox/0001-version-libraries.patch     | 28 ------------
>  .../libubox/libubox/fix-libdir.patch         | 40 ------------------
>  .../recipes-devtools/libubox/libubox_git.bb  | 30 -------------
>  5 files changed, 149 deletions(-)
> 
> libubox is probably uncontroversial and in fact was suggested by
> Khem Raj here: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2018-January/116565.html
> 
> relayd I'm not as sure about as it's in meta-networking and there is
> the off chance it's actually in use.  I'm open to opinions.
> 
> In any event I'm updating meta-openwrt with the good things done in
> meta-openembedded, as well as other work to meake meta-openwrt
> more generally useful (for use as a hybrid with regular OE, 
> as a more openwrt-built-with-OE distro, and as a pick the bits
> that make sense to you repo).
> 

it does. Thanks for sending the patches.

> Regards,
> 
> Daniel
> 




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list