[oe] (no subject)

[William Delacre]

Okay, it makes sense!

My question may seem stupid but then why don’t we always use ‘-native’ for
the dependencies ?

Is it because sometimes we know that the behavior of ‘foo’ and ‘foo-native’
would be the same, independently of the architecture ?

William

Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 18:16, Mark Asselstine <
mark.asselstine at windriver.com> a écrit :

> On Friday, July 27, 2018 12:04:37 PM EDT William Delacre wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the answer, it worked perfectly !
> >
> > There is just one point I don’t really understand : why do we need to
> add a
> > dependency to ‘python-incremental-NATIVE’ ?
> >
> > What would happen if I just add to the python-twisted recipe :
> >
> > DEPENDS += “${PYTHON_PN}-incremental“
>
> This would assume that python is completely arch independent, which it is
> not.
> Assume for example python-incremental had some C extensions, using DEPENDS
> would build them for the target arch yet possibly attempt to run them on
> your
> build host. -native takes care of this.
>
> Some may say this is a bit of a hack since the difference in ARCH *might*
> equate to a difference in behavior. But I have dealt with many python
> recipes
> and have yet to run into any scenario where this potential issue exists.
>
> At least that is what I can recall at the moment. Unfortunately I have
> forgotten some of the subtleties that might be in play.
>
> Mark
>
> >
> > William
> >
> > Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 17:03, Mark Asselstine <
> >
> > mark.asselstine at windriver.com> a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Mark Asselstine
> > >
> > > <mark.asselstine at windriver.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:28 AM, William Delacre
> > > >
> > > > <williamdelacre at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Hi ! :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> I’m facing issues when trying to run ‘bitbake python-twisted’
> > >
> > > (do_compile
> > >
> > > >> error)
> > > >>
> > > >> Log says :
> > > >> “Download error on https://pypi.python.org/simple/incremental/:
> [Errno
> > >
> > > -3]
> > >
> > > >> Temporary failure in name resolution
> > >
> > > With the additional info you sent me along with a second look at the
> > > error I can fairly confidently say I know what the issue is.
> > >
> > > Python, like some other languages (ruby, go...) will attempt to
> > > download dependencies/requirements if they are not present. This is
> > > done "outside" of the bitbake system and thus will ignore
> > > BB_NO_NETWORK and is generally a bad thing. It isn't quite host
> > > contamination but it is very similar. What we do with our python
> > > recipes in bitbake is review a python package's source setup.py,
> > > requirements.txt...files in order to determine what other python
> > > packages are needed, add them as RDEPENDS or similar in order to avoid
> > > the python attempting to complete a download such as this.
> > >
> > > In this case python-twisted 'requires' python-incremental but the
> > > Rocko version of the python-twisted recipe lacks the needed assignment
> > > to ensure this is available in the recipe sysroot and thus the
> > > attempted download.
> > >
> > > Cherry pick commit b08b570c8624303acbb6bb064a7bda466a679df4
> > > [python-twisted: avoid downloading build dependencies] to Rocko and
> > > you will be good to go. You should also follow up this thread with a
> > > request to have this commit put onto Rocko to avoid others hitting the
> > > same issue.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > >> ............
> > > >>
> > > >> distutils.errors.DistutilsError : Could not find suitable
> distribution
> > >
> > > for
> > >
> > > >> Requirement.parse(‘incremental>=16.10.1’)”
> > > >>
> > > >> First of all I’m not connected to internet, so I’ve pre-downloaded
> all
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > >> required packages (twisted-17.9.0.tar.bz2 &
> incremental-17.5.0.tar.gz
> > >
> > > are
> > >
> > > >> present in my build/downloads folder)
> > > >>
> > > >> It’s the first time I have some “downloading issues” and I’m stuck
> on
> > > >> it
> > > >> for a few hours now..
> > > >>
> > > >> Any tips for me ?
> > > >
> > > > Check all aspects of what you have manually downloaded and populated
> > > > in your downloads. My guess is that a checksum or some other detail
> > > > isn't matching and it is rejecting what you have and thus attempting
> > > > to re-download the file.
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks in advance !
> > > >> --
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > > >> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> > > >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
>
>
>