[oe] [meta-java][PATCH 2/2] openjdk-8: combine the -dbg package

Wenlin Kang wenlin.kang at windriver.com
Tue Jun 12 10:59:10 UTC 2018


On 2018年06月12日 16:01, Richard Leitner wrote:

Hi Richard

> Hi Wenlin,
> as we clarified the "one -dbg package per recipe" thing I have some
> comments on the patch itself.
>
>
> On 06/07/2018 11:24 AM, Wenlin Kang wrote:
>> One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks
>> up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable
>> PACKAGES.
> May you please include a reference to that statement from "Ross Burton"?

What about changing the comments as below:

openjdk-8: remove redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg

One recipe should only have one -dbg package, because OE only picks
up all .debug file into the last one -dbg package listed in variable
PACKAGES.

Comments(oe-core's commit a3b000643898d7402b9e57c02e8d10e677cc9722) from
Ross Burton as below:
"meta: more removals of redunant FILES_${PN}-dbg

In some recipes overly-split -dbg packages were merged into PN-dbg. Unless
there's a very good reason, recipes should have a single -dev and -dbg 
package.
"

>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang at windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb | 10 +++-------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb b/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
>> index dd0ed1d..1d7d794 100644
>> --- a/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-8_16xbyy.bb
>> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ do_install() {
>>   }
>>   
>>   PACKAGES_append = " \
>> -    ${PN}-demo-dbg \
>>       ${PN}-demo \
>>       ${PN}-source \
>>   "
>> @@ -47,12 +46,6 @@ FILES_${PN}-dbg_append = "\
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/jre/lib/${JDK_ARCH}/headless/.debug/ \
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/jre/lib/${JDK_ARCH}/xawt/.debug/ \
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/jre/lib/${JDK_ARCH}/client/.debug/ \
>> -"
>> -
>> -FILES_${PN}-demo = " ${JDK_HOME}/demo ${JDK_HOME}/sample "
>> -RDEPENDS_${PN}-demo = " ${PN} "
>> -
>> -FILES_${PN}-demo-dbg = "\
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/gctest/lib/.debug/ \
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/heapTracker/lib/.debug/ \
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/heapViewer/lib/.debug/ \
>> @@ -64,6 +57,9 @@ FILES_${PN}-demo-dbg = "\
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/demo/jvmti/compiledMethodLoad/lib/.debug/ \
>>   "
> AFAIK as all ".debug" are included in the -dbg packages it should
> be fine if you remove the whole FILES_${PN}-dbg_append definition.

I have tested it, that's OK after remove the whole 
FILES_${PN}-dbg_append definition.

Do you mean that we should also remove FILES_${PN}-dbg_append?


>
>>   
>> +FILES_${PN}-demo = " ${JDK_HOME}/demo ${JDK_HOME}/sample "
>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-demo = " ${PN} "
>> +
>>   FILES_${PN}-doc_append = "\
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/man \
>>       ${JDK_HOME}/ASSEMBLY_EXCEPTION \
>
> thanks&regards;Richard.L
>

-- 
Thanks,
Wenlin Kang




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list