[oe] cppzmq: 4.2.3 update

[Andreas Oberritter]

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 10:47:02 -0500
Justin Bronder <jsbronder at cold-front.org> wrote:

> On 01/03/18 16:36 +0100, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > Hi Justin,
> > 
> > On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:16:04 -0500
> > Justin Bronder <jsbronder at cold-front.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > Signed-off-by: Justin Bronder <jsbronder at cold-front.org>
> > > ---
> > >  meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb | 4 ++--
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb
> > > index a64745c94..9e8ad5151 100644
> > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb
> > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/zeromq/cppzmq_git.bb
> > > @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ LICENSE = "MIT"
> > >  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=db174eaf7b55a34a7c89551197f66e94"
> > >  DEPENDS = "zeromq"
> > >  
> > > -SRCREV = "68a7b09cfce01c4c279fba2cf91686fcfc566848"
> > > -PV = "4.1.5+git${SRCPV}"
> > > +PV = "4.2.3"
> > > +SRCREV = "v${PV}"  
> > 
> > we usually don't use tags in SRCREV, because tags may change over time, and
> > therefore bitbake has to query the server each time it parses the recipe, IIRC.  
> 
> Ok.  Should I submit a v2 with the file rename that akuster808 suggested and
> pulling a tarball instead?

I'd say keep the filename and just update PV to 4.2.3+git${SRCPV} in v2. This
reduces the number of changed lines in case SRCREV gets advanced to a commit
between 4.2.3 and a future release.

Regards,
Andreas