[oe] [meta-filesystems][PATCH] ostree: import from meta-overc

Alex Kiernan alex.kiernan at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 13:48:03 UTC 2019


On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:26 PM Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch> wrote:
>
> On 2019-07-26 10:37, Yu, Mingli wrote:
> > On 2019年07月25日 21:58, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 6:42 AM Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:05 AM <mingli.yu at windriver.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Mingli Yu <Mingli.Yu at windriver.com>
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't make any sense to "import from meta-overc". meta-overc,
> >>> was never the authoritative upstream for ostree. That layer has to
> >>> carry a specific version to meet the requirements of some of the
> >>> container libraries, etc, that it requires.
> >>>
> >>> You need to have a look at the latest ostree, the various layers that
> >>> are currently maintaining it, and pick the right version if you want
> >>> to consolidate things here. I'm very doubtful that the right choice is
> >>> the one from meta-overc.
> >>
> >> Yes agreed and this version fails on musl e.g.
> >
> > Make sense, please ignore this patch.
>
> What layers are you considering?
>
> We use OSTree integration of meta-updater and would welcome having a
> common upstream implementation which works for everyone:
>
> https://github.com/advancedtelematic/meta-updater
>

My current one is here:

https://github.com/akiernan/meta-ostree-core/tree/master/recipes-ostree/ostree

Which started off in life from the Intel IoT refkit.

And the sidebranch folks have one here:

https://github.com/sidebranch/meta-ostree/tree/sumo/recipes-ostree/ostree

Getting just a common ostree recipe in meta-oe(?) would be good.

--
Alex Kiernan


More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list