[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] nodejs: 10.16.0 -> 10.16.1

[Martin Jansa]

My guess: it's the recent insane.bbclass change in oe-core/master-next

On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:31 AM Andrej Valek <andrej.valek at siemens.com>
wrote:

> Hi Khem!
>
> I have checked the task, what you mentioned, but there is no errors on
> my side.
>
> DEBUG: Executing python function do_package_qa
> NOTE: DO PACKAGE QA
> DEBUG: Executing python function read_subpackage_metadata
> DEBUG: Python function read_subpackage_metadata finished
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-doc
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs
> NOTE: mips-poky-linux-objdump -p .../packages-split/nodejs/usr/bin/node
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-locale
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-staticdev
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-src
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-systemtap
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-dev
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-dbg
> NOTE: mips-poky-linux-objdump -p
> .../packages-split/nodejs-dbg/usr/bin/.debug/node
> NOTE: Checking Package: nodejs-npm
> NOTE: DONE with PACKAGE QA
> DEBUG: Python function do_package_qa finished
> DEBUG: Executing python function sstate_task_postfunc
> NOTE: Using umask 0o002 (not 22) for sstate packaging
> DEBUG: Executing python function sstate_hardcode_path
> NOTE: Removing hardcoded paths from sstate package: ...
> DEBUG: Python function sstate_hardcode_path finished
> DEBUG: Executing python function sstate_report_unihash
> DEBUG: Python function sstate_report_unihash finished
> DEBUG: Executing shell function sstate_create_package
> DEBUG: Shell function sstate_create_package finished
> DEBUG: Executing python function sstate_sign_package
> DEBUG: Python function sstate_sign_package finished
> DEBUG: Executing python function sstate_hardcode_path_unpack
> DEBUG: Python function sstate_hardcode_path_unpack finished
> DEBUG: Executing python function uninative_changeinterp
> DEBUG: Python function uninative_changeinterp finished
> DEBUG: Python function sstate_task_postfunc finished
>
>
> What is your testing setup?
> Is it fully reproducible? Could you please run only package_qa task?
>
> Regards,
> Andrej
>
> On 8/8/19 6:32 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hi Andrej
> >
> > I am seeing
> >
> > ERROR: nodejs-10.16.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue:
> > /usr/lib/node_modules/npm/node_modules/node-gyp/gyp/samples/samples
> > contained in package nodejs-npm requires /usr/bin/python, but no
> > providers found in RDEPENDS_nodejs-npm? [file-rdeps]
> >
> > Can you see whats going on ?
> >
> > On 8/5/19 11:47 PM, Andrej Valek wrote:
> >> Update nodejs to active 10.x LTS release 10.16.1.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek <andrej.valek at siemens.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../recipes-devtools/nodejs/{nodejs_10.16.0.bb => nodejs_10.16.1.bb}
> | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>  rename meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/{nodejs_10.16.0.bb =>
> nodejs_10.16.1.bb} (97%)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_10.16.0.bb
> b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_10.16.1.bb
> >> similarity index 97%
> >> rename from meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_10.16.0.bb
> >> rename to meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_10.16.1.bb
> >> index aaa1da0aa..8c7795c76 100644
> >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_10.16.0.bb
> >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/nodejs/nodejs_10.16.1.bb
> >> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_class-target = " \
> >>             file://0002-Using-native-torque.patch \
> >>             "
> >>
> >> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "c9a7ab43f8b50c8a4d5545de307b7540"
> >> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "18e37f891d10ea7fbc8f6410c444c2b1d9cc3cbbb1d35aa9c41f761816956608"
> >> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "009e079ce7e2d695642fb61372459a77"
> >> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "6268319c8dddfdaa7886ea3f253ac5c2d133a6c682c00786296227e03f322009"
> >>
> >>  S = "${WORKDIR}/node-v${PV}"
> >>
> >>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>