[oe] [warrior][PATCH] README: updated Maintainers list for Warrior

[Joshua Watt]

On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 11:27 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:52:00AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  README                      |  2 +-
> >  meta-filesystems/README     | 12 ++++++------
> >  meta-gnome/README           | 10 +++++-----
> >  meta-initramfs/README       |  8 ++++----
> >  meta-multimedia/README      | 10 +++++-----
> >  meta-networking/MAINTAINERS | 32 +++-----------------------------
> >  meta-networking/README      |  6 +++---
> >  meta-oe/README              |  8 ++++----
> >  meta-perl/README            | 10 ++++------
> >  meta-python/README          | 12 +++++-------
> >  meta-webserver/README       |  8 ++++----
> >  meta-xfce/README            | 10 +++++-----
> >  12 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/README b/README
> > index 7318f09..881115e 100644
> > --- a/README
> > +++ b/README
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >  Collection of layers for the OE-core universe
> >  
> > -Main layer maintainer: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> > +Warrior maintainer: Armin Kuster  <akuster808 at gmail.com>
> >  
> >  This repository is a collection of layers to suppliment OE-Core
> >  with additional packages, Each layer have designated maintainer
> > diff --git a/meta-filesystems/README b/meta-filesystems/README
> > index 87cb685..d9f07df 100644
> > --- a/meta-filesystems/README
> > +++ b/meta-filesystems/README
> > @@ -10,30 +10,30 @@ Dependencies
> >  This layer depends on:
> >  
> >    URI: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake
> > -  branch: master
> > +  branch: 1.40
> 
> I may be starting off on the wrong patch here, but, did 1.40 or
> bitbake.conf ever get patched up such that rm_work doesn't cause
> world-rebuilds every time?  I recall when digging into this before
> there
> was a "maybe if we tweak $something it'll be happy again with this
> older
> bitbake".  Thanks!

No it didn't... I seem to recall looking at it and it wasn't quite as
trivial as I had assumed but got distracted; sorry about that. If we
are still wanting to make oe-core backward compatible with older
bitbake I can open a bugzilla. 

For reference, here is the discussion: 
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2019-March/279724.html

> 
-- 
Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker at gmail.com>