[oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] networkmanager: Update to 1.18.0

Andrei Gherzan andrei at gherzan.ro
Tue May 28 18:46:16 UTC 2019


Hi,

On 28/05/2019 19.06, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 09:14:17AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:37 AM Andrei Gherzan <andrei at gherzan.ro> wrote:
>>
>>> On 28/05/2019 16.13, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>> Hi Andrei
>>>>
>>>> The musl patches need to be forward ported as well. They dont apply
>>>> cleanly anymore on top of this update.
>>> Seems like. So all the contributions now need to go through local musl
>>> and glibc testing? This sounds a little bit of an overhead and might
>>> discourage people in contributing because usually everyone is working on
>>> one libc variant. Just raising it as a concern. As per this specific
>>> case, I'm going to fix it and push a V2.
>>
>> I understand that and in some cases it’s even narrower where one might just
>> be working on one distribution alone for single architecture for that case
>> failure on architectures they don’t care is
>> also a nuisance
>>
>> It’s wide and far testing we can achieve is good for end user same goes for
>> multiple architectures if someone tests a given architecture and reports
>> build  failures then it’s good to acknowledge that imo
>>
>> It’s not a blocker I expect someone interested in a given regression of
>> this kind to chime and help if possible so don’t see it as an impediment
> Is anyone actually using networkmanager with musl?
>
> There are no obvious usecases where it makes sense, and OE seems to be
> adding security vulnerabilities in the musl build that are not in the 
> glibc build (e.g. -Dsecure_getenv=getenv) so users should better not
> use it in any case.
>
>> If we remain cognizant of the fact that upstream might have wider usecases
>> we will generally be better off cumulatively
I have pushed a V2 which addresses the musl patches as well.
> Upstream ships a copy of systemd code for use as library.
>
> This already implies that trying to support it for musl will be a 
> long-term pain of not upstreamable patches for OE contributors.
That is worrying indeed.

-- 
Andrei Gherzan
gpg: rsa4096/D4D94F67AD0E9640 | t: @agherzan



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list