[oe-issues] [Bug 2893] Fixups for gumstix machines
bugzilla-daemon at tinman.treke.net
bugzilla-daemon at tinman.treke.net
Wed Aug 29 19:52:55 UTC 2007
http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2893
--- Comment #2 from Craig Hughes <craig at gumstix.com> 2007-08-29 12:52:55 ---
PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS += " iwmmxt "
happens in
require conf/machine/include/tune-iwmmxt.conf
which is why I removed it.
I don't understand what "it is policy and needs to go in the distro" means.
Why is tune-iwmmxt.conf not OK, but tune-xscale.conf is OK? Seems like the
rules should be the same for both?
Having the modules stuff be in the distro instead makes sense; should I create
an angstrom-derivative gumstix distro then? Probably makes sense to have
something which creates a distro target for a default set of gumstix packages
to cover more or less what's in the gumstix buildroot default set now...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.openembedded.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Openembedded-issues
mailing list