Runtime target 'openchrome' is unbuildable

[Javi Roman]

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:26:20 +0100
>
>
> "Javi Roman" <javiroman at kernel-labs.org> wrote:
>
>  > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Javi Roman
>  > <javiroman at kernel-labs.org> wrote:
>  > > I have got the following error when I add openchrome to my custom
>  > > file image:
>  > >
>  > >  ------------ my-image.bb ------------
>  > >  require packages/images/bootstrap-image.bb
>  > >
>  > >  export IMAGE_INSTALL += "j2re \
>  > >                 grub \
>  > >                 ipkg \
>  > >                 openchrome \
>  > >                 "
>  > >  inherit image
>  > >
>  > >  export IMAGE_BASENAME = "my-image"
>  > >  ------------------------------------------
>  > >
>  > >  $ bitbake my-image
>  > >
>  > >  NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
>  > >  ERROR: '['/home/jroman/OE_EPIA/local/packages/images/my-image.bb']'
>  > >  RDEPENDS/RRECOMMENDS or otherwise requires the runtime entity
>  > >  'openchrome' but it wasn't found in any PACKAGE or RPROVIDES
>  > > variables NOTE: Runtime target 'openchrome' is unbuildable,
>  > > removing... Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was:
>  > > ['openchrome'] ERROR: Required build target 'my-image' has no
>  > > buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was:
>  > > [my-image', 'openchrome']
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  Openchrome bitbake package is a standard package of OE, so, what's
>  > > happening? Can anybody advice me?
>  > >
>  > >  Thanks a lot.
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >  Javi Roman
>  > >
>  >
>  > BTW, when I try to make "openchrome" package directly I got the
>  > following error:
>  >
>  > $ bitbake openchrome
>  >
>  > .....
>  []
>
> > Applying patch configure.patch
>  > can't find file to patch at input line 3
>  > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>  > The text leading up to this was:
>  > --------------------------
>  > |--- trunk/configure.ac 2007-01-16 16:58:44.000000000 +0000
>  > |+++ trunk/configure.ac 2007-01-16 18:09:26.000000000 +0000
>  > --------------------------
>  > No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
>  > 2 out of 2 hunks ignored
>  > patching file m4/check-build.m4
>  > Patch configure.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
>  > ERROR: Task 6
>  > (/home/jroman/OE_EPIA/openembedded/packages/openchrome/openchrome_svn.bb,
>  > do_patch) failed NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 746 tasks of which
>  > 728 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.
>  > ERROR:
>  > '/home/jroman/OE_EPIA/openembedded/packages/openchrome/openchrome_svn.bb'
>  > failed
>  >
>  >
>  > Openchrome was tested?
>
>  Possibly yes, possibly no. .dev is development branch, so it doesn't
>  require formal testing to get stuff in. Also, there's a notion of
>  "bitrot" which especially applies to packages based on SCM revisions
>  (comparing to release versions). Also, some packages are used often and
>  always buildable in OE, some rarely, and their issues may be unnoticed
>  and unfixed for long time.
>
>
>  > Could anybody get around this problem?
>
>  You? OE is not a magic box out of which you can pull out anything on
>  wish, it's just a build tool. And anyone who does build engineering
>  should be prepared to do patching, patch fixing, version and
>  revision review and hunting, etc., anyway.

I don't speak about somebody solves the problem for my (I didn't
express correctly the question, .., bad english)

greetings

-- 
Javi Roman