[Openembedded-users] avr32 build issue

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Tue Dec 21 22:55:59 UTC 2010


2010/12/21 Bjørn Forsman <bjorn.forsman at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On 21 December 2010 18:44, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On (21/12/10 16:49), Kaushal Kumar wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I am trying to build for AVR32 following the instructions at:
>>> http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Getting_started
>>>
>>> My local.conf file contains:
>>> BBFILES = "${HOME}/oe/openembedded/recipes/*/*.bb"
>>> MACHINE = “atngw100″
>>> TARGET_OS = “linux-uclibc”
>>> DISTRO = “angstrom-2010.x″
>>>
>>> I execute the command: bitbake nano
>>>
>>> The Build Configuration is shown as:
>>> BB_VERSION        = "1.10.0"
>>> METADATA_BRANCH   = "org.openembedded.dev"
>>> METADATA_REVISION = "afb05a2"
>>> TARGET_ARCH       = "avr32"
>>> TARGET_OS         = "linux"
>>> MACHINE           = "atngw100"
>>> DISTRO            = "angstrom"
>>> DISTRO_VERSION    = "next"
>>>
>>> My question is why does the build configuration take TARGET_OS as linux
>>> instead of linux-uclibc?
>>
>> you should not set TARGET_OS yourself on angstrom. You should set
>> ANGSTROMLIBC = "uclibc"
>> in your local.conf and remove TARGET_OS = "linux-uclibc"
>> this should help this case hopefully
>
> Why is it that you have to set ANGSTROMLIBC = "uclibc" in local.conf?
> If this is the only libc that builds for AVR32, couldn't OE/bitbake select it
> automatically instead of causing a build failure?

yes it could. If this will always be the case that avr32 will not
support eglibc/glibc

>
> Best regards,
> Bjørn Forsman
>




More information about the Openembedded-users mailing list