[Openembedded-users] Problem with building angstrom-2008.1 for at91sam9m10g45ek

[Terry Barnaby]

On 03/15/2011 02:23 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 01:03 PM, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 3/15/2011 1:36 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to build angstrom-2008.1 for a at91sam9m10g45ek but am having
>>> an error.
>>>
>>> NOTE: Applying patch 'tclprivate.diff'
>>> (openembedded/recipes/tcltk/tcl-8.5.8/tclprivate.diff)
>>> NOTE: Applying patch 'mips-tclstrtod.patch'
>>> (openembedded/recipes/tcltk/tcl-8.5.8/mips-tclstrtod.patch)
>>> ERROR: Task 693
>>> (virtual:native:/scratch/OpenEmbedded/openembedded/recipes/tcltk/tcl_8.5.8.bb,
>>> do_patch) failed with exit code 1
>>> FATAL: Execution of 'quilt
>>> --quiltrc=/scratch/OpenEmbedded/tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/bin/quiltrc push'
>>> failed with exit code 1:
>>> Applying patch mips-tclstrtod.patch
>>> patch: **** rejecting target file name with ".." component:
>>> ../generic/tclStrToD.c
>>> Patch mips-tclstrtod.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
>>
>> The problem seems to be only with the last patch applied onto tcl sources. Since
>> it concerns only MIPS architecture, you can skip it for your ARM chip by
>> removing into tcl_8.5.8.bb the line file://mips-tclstrtod.patch;striplevel=0 \
>>
>> It doesn't solve the problem but then you could continue. You have a look on the
>> sources to see if the patches can be applied, maybe the problem is the patch level.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Ludovic Desroches
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-users mailing list
>> Openembedded-users at linuxtogo.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-users
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Thanks, that has allowed the build to continue, I will see what happens.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Terry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-users mailing list
> Openembedded-users at linuxtogo.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-users

Should I report this as an OpenEmbedded bug somewhere ?

Terry