<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 19:42, Woody Dickson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:woodydickson@gmail.com">woodydickson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>Hi Anatoly,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks for your advice.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So, is it better to build the web server as part of the Angstrom myself or bitbake the web server seperately?</div></blockquote><div><br>I think seperately. Try build base-image and boot it. After this try build need web server and install package. bitbake generate package for all builded apps.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Also, I notice that Angstrom has more stuff than I need into the beagleboard, such as gcc, is it better to remove those receipes that I don't need? </div>
<div></div></blockquote><div>bitbake not include gcc in image. gcc build and install local. <br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div> </div>
<div>Does anyone know where I can get a bear minimal Angstrom that can just boot the beagleboard, and then I can build my webserver seperately?</div>
<div> </div></blockquote><div>bitbake base-image <br>This include dropbear and opkg-cl <br><br>You read this:<br></div></div><a href="http://docs.openembedded.org/usermanual/html/chapter_getting_oe.html">http://docs.openembedded.org/usermanual/html/chapter_getting_oe.html</a><br>
?<br>