ELC meeting topics

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:34 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> I was talking to Martin and he raised some points we should discuss:
> 
> * BBCLASS_EXTEND and .inc files don't work well with the layer approach
> * Import xorg structure from OE .dev into meta-oe
> * Task-boot in meta-angstrom is fit for meta-oe
> * Angstrom-core-tweaks seems for meta-oe as well
> * Global poky files suck:
> 
> 10:18 <JaMa|Wrk> and on ELC meetup, when doing oe-core rebranding,  please raise my concern about couple of global poky files, like SRCREVs etc.. I really hate 
>                  openembedded-core/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc file included directly from layer.conf :/
> 10:20 <JaMa|Wrk> as SRCREV_pn-u-boot ??= "v2010.12" there is harder to overwrite from own u-boot recipe (SRCREV_pn-u-boot works, SRCREV itself doesn't ofc), but enduser will be 
>                  confused for sure when most recipes have just SRCREV and sometimes it's not enough
> 
> Does anyone have other points? We should try to collect them before we meet on sunday :)

I'm going to propose:

* Yocto steering group discussion summary (inc BSPs + interest groups)
* Layer tooling brainstorming
* OECore branding

I'd also like to touch on the various major changes we're thinking about
for Yocto 1.1 (multilib, config options) and see if there is anything at
the TSC/architecture level we should be touching upon. There are
proposals on the mailing list about these now.

Cheers,

Richard