Category talk:Dev - Revision history

Sledz: little add to my statement

2009-05-12T07:33:09Z

little add to my statement

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 12 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Dev vs. Developers ==		== Dev vs. Developers ==

	Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. Also '''Dev''' is very ambiguous. Does it mean '''Development'''? Or '''Developers'''? Or '''Devices'''? So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

	: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)		: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

	: One advantage to "Dev" is that it is easier to add categories to pages without making mistakes. It is my opinion that the advantages of changing to Developers at this point, do not outweight the hassle, broken links, etc. There are bigger fish to fry (at least for me) [[User:Cbrake\|Cbrake]] ~~...~~		: One advantage to "Dev" is that it is easier to add categories to pages without making mistakes. It is my opinion that the advantages of changing to Developers at this point, do not outweight the hassle, broken links, etc. There are bigger fish to fry (at least for me) -- [[User:Cbrake\|Cbrake]] 22:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Cbrake at 20:22, 11 May 2009

2009-05-11T20:22:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 11 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)		: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

	: One advantage to "Dev" is that it is easier to add categories to pages without making mistakes. It is my opinion that the advantages of changing to Developers at this point, do not outweight the hassle, broken links, etc. There are bigger fish to fry (at least for me) ...		: One advantage to "Dev" is that it is easier to add categories to pages without making mistakes. It is my opinion that the advantages of changing to Developers at this point, do not outweight the hassle, broken links, etc. There are bigger fish to fry (at least for me) [[User:Cbrake\|Cbrake]] ...

Cbrake: add opinon on dev vs developers

2009-05-11T20:22:36Z

add opinon on dev vs developers

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 11 May 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)		: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

			: One advantage to "Dev" is that it is easier to add categories to pages without making mistakes. It is my opinion that the advantages of changing to Developers at this point, do not outweight the hassle, broken links, etc. There are bigger fish to fry (at least for me) ...

Laibsch: /* Dev vs. Developers */

2009-02-10T04:52:03Z

Dev vs. Developers

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 10 February 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

	: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site.		: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site. --[[User:Laibsch\|Laibsch]] 04:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Laibsch: /* Dev vs. Developers */

2009-02-10T04:51:02Z

Dev vs. Developers

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:51, 10 February 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

			: I have no strong opinion on this one. I like short URLs and things which is why I chose what I chose. The most important branch is called org.openembedded.dev, not org.openembedded.development. But feel free to make the changes if you think this would improve the site.

Sledz: /* Dev vs. Developers */

2009-02-09T11:13:55Z

Dev vs. Developers

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 9 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Dev vs. Developers ==		== Dev vs. Developers ==

	Is ~~there~~ really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		Is it really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz\|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Sledz: Dev vs. Developers

2008-10-10T13:43:17Z

Dev vs. Developers

New page

== Dev vs. Developers ==

Is there really a good idea to use abbreviation as lemma titles? For a beginner it would be much easier to understand what a lemma is for if it has a intuitive name. So I suggest to rename this category to '''Developers'''. -- [[User:Sledz|SSZ]] 13:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)