Oedem/2009 TSC election - Revision history

Laibsch at 16:56, 10 January 2010

2010-01-10T16:56:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 10 January 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:

	: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.		: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.

			[[Category:OEDEM]]

Laibsch: Reverted edits by Glenn (Talk); changed back to last version by 85.145.118.37

2010-01-10T16:13:54Z

Reverted edits by Glenn (Talk); changed back to last version by 85.145.118.37

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 10 January 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:

	: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.		: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.

	~~[[Category:Community]]~~

Glenn: +cat

2010-01-09T08:19:59Z

+cat

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 9 January 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:

	: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.		: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.

			[[Category:Community]]

85.145.118.37 at 09:57, 4 December 2009

2009-12-04T09:57:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 4 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The~~ following have been ~~nominated~~ for ~~election~~ to the ~~OE technical steering committee:~~		At Oedem/2009 the following people have been proposed for the TSC, but that has nothing to do with the proper proposing protocol, so you can safely ignore this page.

	* '''Phil Blundell'''		* '''Phil Blundell'''

Crofton at 16:11, 12 October 2009

2009-10-12T16:11:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 12 October 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: ''(Nominated by Stefan Schmidt)''		: ''(Nominated by Stefan Schmidt)''

	: Both Holger an Phil have an deep understanding on how OE and bitbake work and was designed to work. Both are thinking about ways to ~~furtehr~~ improve the current situation and contribute code and ideas to reach the goals. Maybe even more important are the way they deal with people who want to contribute. They listen, workout the underlying problems and then helping these people to reach their goals.		: Both Holger an Phil have an deep understanding on how OE and bitbake work and was designed to work. Both are thinking about ways to further improve the current situation and contribute code and ideas to reach the goals. Maybe even more important are the way they deal with people who want to contribute. They listen, workout the underlying problems and then helping these people to reach their goals.

	* '''Holger Freyther'''		* '''Holger Freyther'''

85.210.191.75: New page: The following have been nominated for election to the OE technical steering committee: * '''Phil Blundell''' : ''(Nominated by Stefan Schmidt)'' : Both Holger an Phil have an deep under...

2009-10-11T11:48:59Z

New page: The following have been nominated for election to the OE technical steering committee: * '''Phil Blundell''' : ''(Nominated by Stefan Schmidt)'' : Both Holger an Phil have an deep under...

New page

The following have been nominated for election to the OE technical steering committee:

* '''Phil Blundell'''

: ''(Nominated by Stefan Schmidt)''

: Both Holger an Phil have an deep understanding on how OE and bitbake work and was designed to work. Both are thinking about ways to furtehr improve the current situation and contribute code and ideas to reach the goals. Maybe even more important are the way they deal with people who want to contribute. They listen, workout the underlying problems and then helping these people to reach their goals.

* '''Holger Freyther'''

: ''(Nominated by Stefan Schmidt)''

: Both Holger an Phil have an deep understanding on how OE and bitbake work and was designed to work. Both are thinking about ways to furtehr improve the current situation and contribute code and ideas to reach the goals. Maybe even more important are the way they deal with people who want to contribute. They listen, workout the underlying problems and then helping these people to reach their goals.

* '''Chris Larson'''

: ''(Nominated by Phil Blundell)''

* '''Mickey Lauer'''

: As one of the founders of the OE project I have lots of experience with all parts of the system, including the BitBake core, the build classes, and the recipes. In fact, I have contributed a major part of all that.

: I have left the former core team since this failed to provide any transparency to the growing OE community about how decisions were made.

: I have also used OE in commercial projects, hence I know about the different -- and sometimes contradicting -- requirements non-commercial and commercial projects have. I have always tried to improve OE in a way that suits as much stakeholders as possible, trying to prevent isolated solutions. As such, I'd love to serve on the TSC helping to facilitate further OE development.

* '''Richard Purdie'''

: I'm a long standing OE developer and member of the community who has extensive experience with the core elements of the system having successfully developed and handled many significant OE architectural improvements. My role as the lead developer and maintainer of bitbake gives me insight into the core workings of the project and as the architect of Poky, I also understand the needs of derived projects. As part of the former 'core team' I've also experience in mediation and in guiding the project. I'd like to use this experience for the benefit of the TSC.

: ''(Richard was also nominated by Stefan Schmidt.)''

* '''Khem Raj'''

: I would like to nominate myself. Over the last couple of years I have got good understanding of OE's internals and From my experience in past I understand needs of embedded systems and embedded Linux in particularly well. I think I understand the core pieces of OE well now which will help me make right decisions and suggestions in the TSC especially in the areas of toolchain and system libraries.