[bitbake-devel] [PATCH] bb.utils.which is intend to locate regular file only as it is written in comment

Vitaliy Kharin kvserr at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 10:43:22 UTC 2014


Actually it would return true if path will be a symlink. I checked it.
Also please look at
https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.path.html#os.path.isfile
"...This follows symbolic links, so both islink()
<https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.path.html#os.path.islink> and isfile()
<https://docs.python.org/2/library/os.path.html#os.path.isfile> can be true
for the same path."


2014-07-08 22:54 GMT+04:00 Christopher Larson <clarson at kergoth.com>:

>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Vitaliy Kharin <kvserr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Kharin <vitaliy.kharin at lge.com>
>> ---
>>  bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py
>> index 0be45e1..c48b237 100644
>> --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py
>> +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py
>> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ def which(path, item, direction = 0, history = False):
>>      for p in paths:
>>          next = os.path.join(p, item)
>>          hist.append(next)
>> -        if os.path.exists(next):
>> +        if os.path.isfile(next):
>>              if not os.path.isabs(next):
>>                  next = os.path.abspath(next)
>>              if history:
>>
>
> This seems questionable to me. With this, it wouldn't find symlinks, no?
> --
> Christopher Larson
> clarson at kergoth dot com
> Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
> Maintainer - Tslib
> Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
>



-- 
-----------------------
Best regards,
Vitaliy Kharin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/attachments/20140709/fe9678a6/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the bitbake-devel mailing list