[bitbake-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Sumo pull request
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 00:03:05 UTC 2019
This stable/sumo-nmut?
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-nmut
I'm sorry, but I still don't see it there.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 9:58 PM akuster808 <akuster808 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 3/23/19 1:37 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> > Why would I reference patchwork? How does that work if this is the only
> message sent out?
>
> I don't want you to reference patchwork.
>
> I'm only asking why you haven't included this change (
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2019-March/279999.html
> if you don't like the link to patchwork) in the pull request, or in
> sumo-next branch when patchwork status says "sumo-next".
>
>
> its in the next series. I had build failures that put everything on old
> for two weeks while I troubleshot the failures Adding new changes would
> have just added to the problem. if you look at stable/sumo-nmut, it has
> your changes and a few more.
>
> - armin
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM akuster <akuster at mvista.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/23/19 1:32 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a reason for not including
>> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/159465/
>> ?
>>
>> Why would I reference patchwork? How does that work if this is the only
>> message sent out?
>>
>> It says sumo-next on patchwork, but I don't know which sumo-next it is, I
>> don't see it in:
>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/log/?h=sumo-next
>>
>> I don't have write access to core.
>>
>> the changes are in contrib:
>> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-next
>> - armin
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 3:12 AM Armin Kuster <akuster808 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please consider this for the next sumo update
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 6d56e912fbbaa22830b4da5ab230586a3d15b23e:
>>>
>>> package_rpm/archiver: Apply bandaid to src.rpm creation (2019-02-25
>>> 22:13:08 +0000)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib stable/sumo-next
>>>
>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-next
>>>
>>> Chen Qi (2):
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-15686
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-15688
>>>
>>> George McCollister (5):
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-15687
>>> systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16864
>>> systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16865
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-6954
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2019-6454
>>>
>>> Marcus Cooper (1):
>>> systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16866
>>>
>>> Mingli Yu (1):
>>> logrotate.py: restore /etc/logrotate.d/wtmp
>>>
>>> ROGEZ Matthieu (1):
>>> systemd: Fix typo in root home variable.
>>>
>>> Richard Purdie (1):
>>> oeqa/runtime/dnf: Fix test error when static libs are enabled
>>>
>>> Stefan Agner (1):
>>> run-postinsts: for dpkg/opkg, do not rely on /etc/*-postinsts
>>>
>>> meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/dnf.py | 2 +-
>>> meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/logrotate.py | 6 +-
>>> ...sive-let-s-rework-the-recursive-logic-to-.patch | 252 +++
>>> ...eserializing-state-always-use-read_line-L.patch | 250 +++
>>> ...sure-we-have-enough-space-for-the-DHCP6-o.patch | 39 +
>>> ...n-t-resolve-pathnames-when-traversing-rec.patch | 643 +++++++
>>> .../systemd/systemd/0002-Make-tmpfiles-safe.patch | 1828
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ...-not-store-the-iovec-entry-for-process-co.patch | 193 +++
>>> ...ld-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-1k.patch | 60 +
>>> ...ote-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-i.patch | 79 +
>>> ...nal-fix-out-of-bounds-read-CVE-2018-16866.patch | 49 +
>>> .../systemd/systemd/CVE-2019-6454.patch | 210 +++
>>> ...e-receive-an-invalid-dbus-message-ignore-.patch | 61 +
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_237.bb | 13 +-
>>> .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts | 21 +-
>>> .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts.service | 1 -
>>> 16 files changed, 3694 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-chown-recursive-let-s-rework-the-recursive-logic-to-.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-core-when-deserializing-state-always-use-read_line-L.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-dhcp6-make-sure-we-have-enough-space-for-the-DHCP6-o.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-tmpfiles-don-t-resolve-pathnames-when-traversing-rec.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0002-Make-tmpfiles-safe.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0024-journald-do-not-store-the-iovec-entry-for-process-co.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0025-journald-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-1k.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0026-journal-remote-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-i.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0027-journal-fix-out-of-bounds-read-CVE-2018-16866.patch
>>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/CVE-2019-6454.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/sd-bus-if-we-receive-an-invalid-dbus-message-ignore-.patch
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bitbake-devel mailing list
>>> bitbake-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/attachments/20190324/6beef128/attachment.html>
More information about the bitbake-devel
mailing list