[bitbake-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Sumo pull request
akuster808
akuster808 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 01:12:51 UTC 2019
On 3/23/19 5:03 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> This stable/sumo-nmut?
> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-nmut
>
> I'm sorry, but I still don't see it there.
So true.
The contrib I used to build out of for Yocto AB.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-nmut
Sorry, I am in the middle of re-aligning my processes from what was
easier for me to what works better for the community.
it will be corrected soon.
- armin
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 9:58 PM akuster808 <akuster808 at gmail.com
> <mailto:akuster808 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/23/19 1:37 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> > Why would I reference patchwork? How does that work if this is
>> the only message sent out?
>>
>> I don't want you to reference patchwork.
>>
>> I'm only asking why you haven't included this change
>> (http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2019-March/279999.html
>> if you don't like the link to patchwork) in the pull request, or
>> in sumo-next branch when patchwork status says "sumo-next".
>
> its in the next series. I had build failures that put everything
> on old for two weeks while I troubleshot the failures Adding new
> changes would have just added to the problem. if you look at
> stable/sumo-nmut, it has your changes and a few more.
>
> - armin
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM akuster <akuster at mvista.com
>> <mailto:akuster at mvista.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/23/19 1:32 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there a reason for not including
>>> https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/159465/
>>> ?
>>>
>> Why would I reference patchwork? How does that work if this
>> is the only message sent out?
>>
>>> It says sumo-next on patchwork, but I don't know which
>>> sumo-next it is, I don't see it in:
>>> http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/log/?h=sumo-next
>> I don't have write access to core.
>>
>> the changes are in contrib:
>> https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-next
>> - armin
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 3:12 AM Armin Kuster
>>> <akuster808 at gmail.com <mailto:akuster808 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please consider this for the next sumo update
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 6d56e912fbbaa22830b4da5ab230586a3d15b23e:
>>>
>>> package_rpm/archiver: Apply bandaid to src.rpm
>>> creation (2019-02-25 22:13:08 +0000)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
>>> <http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib>
>>> stable/sumo-next
>>>
>>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=stable/sumo-next
>>>
>>> Chen Qi (2):
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-15686
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-15688
>>>
>>> George McCollister (5):
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-15687
>>> systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16864
>>> systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16865
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2018-6954
>>> systemd: fix CVE-2019-6454
>>>
>>> Marcus Cooper (1):
>>> systemd: Security fix CVE-2018-16866
>>>
>>> Mingli Yu (1):
>>> logrotate.py: restore /etc/logrotate.d/wtmp
>>>
>>> ROGEZ Matthieu (1):
>>> systemd: Fix typo in root home variable.
>>>
>>> Richard Purdie (1):
>>> oeqa/runtime/dnf: Fix test error when static libs are
>>> enabled
>>>
>>> Stefan Agner (1):
>>> run-postinsts: for dpkg/opkg, do not rely on
>>> /etc/*-postinsts
>>>
>>> meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/dnf.py |
>>> 2 +-
>>> meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/logrotate.py |
>>> 6 +-
>>> ...sive-let-s-rework-the-recursive-logic-to-.patch |
>>> 252 +++
>>> ...eserializing-state-always-use-read_line-L.patch |
>>> 250 +++
>>> ...sure-we-have-enough-space-for-the-DHCP6-o.patch | 39 +
>>> ...n-t-resolve-pathnames-when-traversing-rec.patch |
>>> 643 +++++++
>>> .../systemd/systemd/0002-Make-tmpfiles-safe.patch |
>>> 1828 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ...-not-store-the-iovec-entry-for-process-co.patch |
>>> 193 +++
>>> ...ld-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-1k.patch | 60 +
>>> ...ote-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-i.patch | 79 +
>>> ...nal-fix-out-of-bounds-read-CVE-2018-16866.patch | 49 +
>>> .../systemd/systemd/CVE-2019-6454.patch |
>>> 210 +++
>>> ...e-receive-an-invalid-dbus-message-ignore-.patch | 61 +
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_237.bb
>>> <http://systemd_237.bb> | 13 +-
>>> .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts/run-postinsts |
>>> 21 +-
>>> .../run-postinsts/run-postinsts.service | 1 -
>>> 16 files changed, 3694 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-chown-recursive-let-s-rework-the-recursive-logic-to-.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-core-when-deserializing-state-always-use-read_line-L.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-dhcp6-make-sure-we-have-enough-space-for-the-DHCP6-o.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0001-tmpfiles-don-t-resolve-pathnames-when-traversing-rec.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0002-Make-tmpfiles-safe.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0024-journald-do-not-store-the-iovec-entry-for-process-co.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0025-journald-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-1k.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0026-journal-remote-set-a-limit-on-the-number-of-fields-i.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/0027-journal-fix-out-of-bounds-read-CVE-2018-16866.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/CVE-2019-6454.patch
>>> create mode 100644
>>> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/sd-bus-if-we-receive-an-invalid-dbus-message-ignore-.patch
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bitbake-devel mailing list
>>> bitbake-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>>> <mailto:bitbake-devel at lists.openembedded.org>
>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/attachments/20190323/205cf564/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the bitbake-devel
mailing list