[Openembedded-architecture] RFC: Non-Linux BSPs and/or non-standard architectures
Paul Eggleton
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Thu May 11 22:30:58 UTC 2017
On Friday, 12 May 2017 9:44:57 AM NZST akuster808 wrote:
> On 05/11/2017 02:18 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > Somewhat related to the other Yocto Project Compliance 2.0 discussion, I
> > have a question about supporting non-Linux BSPs or BSPs with both Linux
> > and non-Linux targets. I've noticed there's some support for "baremetal"
> > builds. What about non-standard architectures? Will that affect Compliance
> > factors in any way?
>
> I would have to say the Project would have to change its scope and
> definition.
>
> "The Yocto Project is an open source collaboration project that provides
> templates, tools and methods to help you create custom Linux-based
> systems for embedded products regardless of the hardware architecture. "
>
> Non-standard Arch is fine, non Linux is not.
I would say (without any authority, just based on personal observation) that a
number of YP member organisations have an interest in RTOSs and mixed RTOS/
Linux environments, so whilst it might not be something we spend a lot of time
on (and thus perhaps not part of our core mission statement) that it shouldn't
be a compliance issue, in fact it's in our best interests to give some support
to these.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-architecture
mailing list