[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] task-base: allow distribution to define apm provider
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 08:45:20 UTC 2011
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:34:55AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:00 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb | 5 ++++-
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb
> > index 138e617..10f3af4 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb
> > @@ -179,8 +179,11 @@ RDEPENDS_task-base-acpi = "\
> > acpid \
> > libacpi "
> >
> > +# Distro can override apm provider
> > +DISTRO_APM ?= "apm"
> > +
> > RDEPENDS_task-base-apm = "\
> > - apm \
> > + ${DISTRO_APM} \
> > apmd"
>
> Can you explain a little more about why a distro would do this please?
> I'm a little worried this whole file could become a set of DISTRO_*
> variables :/.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
For example in SHR we're using FSO which provides apm replacement called fso-apm which
conflicts with standard apm.
We can rename it to VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_apm (like
VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives) if you prefer such namespace.
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list