[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] task-base: allow distribution to define apm provider
Khem Raj
raj.khem at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 20:08:53 UTC 2011
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:34:55AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:00 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa at gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb | 5 ++++-
>> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb
>> > index 138e617..10f3af4 100644
>> > --- a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb
>> > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb
>> > @@ -179,8 +179,11 @@ RDEPENDS_task-base-acpi = "\
>> > acpid \
>> > libacpi "
>> >
>> > +# Distro can override apm provider
>> > +DISTRO_APM ?= "apm"
>> > +
>> > RDEPENDS_task-base-apm = "\
>> > - apm \
>> > + ${DISTRO_APM} \
>> > apmd"
>>
>> Can you explain a little more about why a distro would do this please?
>> I'm a little worried this whole file could become a set of DISTRO_*
>> variables :/.
>>
may be define virtual/apm package and use that in RDEPENDS
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>
> For example in SHR we're using FSO which provides apm replacement called fso-apm which
> conflicts with standard apm.
>
> We can rename it to VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_apm (like
> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives) if you prefer such namespace.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list