[OE-core] [PATCH 10/22] tune/arch-powerpc: Use fpu-soft to set PPCPKGSFX_FPU
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Aug 1 14:13:30 UTC 2011
On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 00:36 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
>> From: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
>>
>> Its more likely that we explicitly set soft-floating point support for a
>> given target than hard. So use 'fpu-soft' in TUNE_FEATURES rather than
>> 'fpu-hard' to determine setting 'nf' (no-float) in PPCPKGSFX_FPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
>> ---
>> meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
>> index 8cc76ab..013755d 100644
>> --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
>> +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/powerpc/arch-powerpc.inc
>> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ TARGET_FPU .= "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "soft", "", d)}
>>
>> ABIEXTENSION = "${@['','spe'][d.getVar('TARGET_FPU', True) in ['ppc-efd', 'ppc-efs']]}"
>>
>> -PPCPKGSFX_FPU = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-hard" , "", "-nf", d)}"
>> +PPCPKGSFX_FPU = "${@bb.utils.contains("TUNE_FEATURES", "fpu-soft", "-nf", "", d)}"
>>
>> TUNE_PKGARCH ?= "${TUNE_ARCH}${PPCPKGSFX_FPU}"
>
> Whilst the change itself may or may not be ok, it would need to change
> the various boards that are already setting or not setting fpu-hard as a
> feature so as it stands this change is incomplete.
Which boards are you speaking of? I'm not aware of any that set soft float at this point for PPC.
- k
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list