[OE-core] [PATCH] angstrom-task-gnome: Added gedit to task-gnome dependencies

Joel A Fernandes agnel.joel at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 02:12:09 UTC 2011


Sorry to bother you but are you sure?

"if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go
to oe-devel list too"

meta-angstrom patches are not ontop of oe.dev

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dmytriyenko, Denys <denys at ti.com> wrote:
> He meant angstrom-devel and/or oe-devel,  not oe-core.
>
> Denys
>
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Joel A Fernandes" <agnel.joel at gmail.com>
> To: "Khem Raj" <raj.khem at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer"
> <openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org>, "Kooi, Koen" <k-kooi at ti.com>,
> "Dmytriyenko, Denys" <denys at ti.com>
> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] angstrom-task-gnome: Added gedit to task-gnome
> dependencies
> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 18:07
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Jason Kridner <jkridner at beagleboard.org>
>> wrote:
>>> I see the README says this should be on the OE-core list, but maybe this
>>> should go on the Angstrom list?
>>>
>>
>> it should go to angstrom-devel list in anycase
>> if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go
>> to oe-devel list too. oe-core is not needed
>
> Hi Khem, just confirming that you mean meta-angstrom patches should go
> to both oe-core and angstrom lists?
>
> Thanks,
> Joel
>




More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list