[OE-core] [PATCH] angstrom-task-gnome: Added gedit to task-gnome dependencies

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Joel A Fernandes <agnel.joel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry to bother you but are you sure?
>
> "if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go
> to oe-devel list too"
>
> meta-angstrom patches are not ontop of oe.dev
>

yes meta-angstrom patches go to angstrom-devel list. No need to send
them to oe-devel
or oe-core mls unless there is some change that affects these other layers

> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dmytriyenko, Denys <denys at ti.com> wrote:
>> He meant angstrom-devel and/or oe-devel,  not oe-core.
>>
>> Denys
>>
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Joel A Fernandes" <agnel.joel at gmail.com>
>> To: "Khem Raj" <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer"
>> <openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org>, "Kooi, Koen" <k-kooi at ti.com>,
>> "Dmytriyenko, Denys" <denys at ti.com>
>> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH] angstrom-task-gnome: Added gedit to task-gnome
>> dependencies
>> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 18:07
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Jason Kridner <jkridner at beagleboard.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I see the README says this should be on the OE-core list, but maybe this
>>>> should go on the Angstrom list?
>>>>
>>>
>>> it should go to angstrom-devel list in anycase
>>> if this is a patch against angstrom on top of oe.dev then it should go
>>> to oe-devel list too. oe-core is not needed
>>
>> Hi Khem, just confirming that you mean meta-angstrom patches should go
>> to both oe-core and angstrom lists?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joel
>>
>