[OE-core] [PATCH 09/16] uclibc_0.9.32: Implement sync_file_range2.

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 17:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> ++#if defined __NR_sync_file_range2
>> ++#define __NR_sync_file_range __NR_sync_file_range2
>> ++#endif
>
> Does that really work?  If I remember right, the argument lists for
> those two syscalls are not the same.  It isn't entirely obvious to me
> that it makes sense to just define one as an alias for the other.
>
It wont work.
sent a wrong patch. I have a better one.

> p.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>