[OE-core] [PATCH 09/16] uclibc_0.9.32: Implement sync_file_range2.

[Khem Raj]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Phil Blundell <philb at gnu.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 17:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> ++#if defined __NR_sync_file_range2
>>> ++#define __NR_sync_file_range __NR_sync_file_range2
>>> ++#endif
>>
>> Does that really work?  If I remember right, the argument lists for
>> those two syscalls are not the same.  It isn't entirely obvious to me
>> that it makes sense to just define one as an alias for the other.
>>
> It wont work.
> sent a wrong patch. I have a better one.

I have updated this patch in the pull request tree.

>
>> p.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>
>