[OE-core] Architecture mismatch QA check not fatal?

[Koen Kooi]

Op 20 jun 2011, om 15:55 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:

> On 6/20/11 8:31 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> 
>> Op 20 jun 2011, om 15:29 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 08:23 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>>> (The minor cases are primarily firmware loaded into off-board cards in PCI
>>>> chasis and such.. occasionally these firmware are ELF and of an architecture not
>>>> the same as the host..  it's rare, but I have seen it before.)
>>> 
>>> Shouldn't those firmware images just go in a separate package?
> 
> Depends on how the system is configured..  Often I see them packaged with the
> firmware loader -- which is the proper arch, etc..
> 
>> If we do that we can use INSANE_SKIP_firmwarepackage = True, which seems like a good solution.
> 
> Ya, as long as we can skip -- or change it to a warning instead of an error.. I
> think we're good.  Like I said, this is rare and unlikely to be an issue in
> anything in oe-core, meta-oe or even the distributions based on oe-core.. but I
> have seen it in customer production environments before.

We have exactly 1 xorg driver in oe .dev that triggers it :)