[OE-core] oe-core cleanup...

Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org
Wed Mar 2 19:18:41 UTC 2011


On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 19:27 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 2 mrt 2011, om 19:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > Thanks for starting this thread Mark, I've also just been looking at
> > this question so its timely.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 11:30 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> >> I finally got a chance to look at the oe-core and where it currently is..  Some
> >> suggestions below:
> >> 
> >> LICENSE file, this may need to be cleaned up to only cover the components
> >> actually in the oe-core.
> >> 
> >> README likely needs some revision
> >> 
> >> README.hardware needs a lot of revision.  Anything outside of support for QEMU
> >> should be removed.
> >> 
> >> The meta-demoapps and meta-rt components, will those be staying or going?
> >> 
> >> The meta/recipes.txt needs to be verified as still what we want -- I assume it
> >> is at this point..
> >> 
> >> meta/recipes-...  sato, qt, gnome, I thought were going elsewhere?
> >> 
> >> Do the items in the "scripts" need to be renamed or is Poky being kept in the
> >> naming?  Same with the poky-init-build-env?
> >> 
> >> Then I also assume the items in the documentation directory need to be cleaned
> >> up as well...
> >> 
> >> Let me know what you'd like me to try and tackle -- or if we need to bring these
> >> items up at the TSC for recommendation.
> > 
> > I'm proposing this change so far:
> > 
> > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=rpurdie/roorg&id=891ad22536b49d4fee066a5865ad730f791d36e9
> > 
> > with those relocated files being removed from oe-core. Any objections to
> > that to start with? 
> 
> Why not put the recipes in meta-oe? I have need for e.g eds-dbus and would like to have that in meta-oe.

Which pieces are we talking about? Does oe-core want sato? Should some
of these go to meta-gnome and is that what we want? Or do we want all of
sato there?

I was under the impression sato might not be wanted but I'm open to
influence either way on that. Certainly there are some pieces "we" as in
Yocto put into recipe-sato that could arguably be positioned elsewhere.

Are you also concerned about meta-demoapps or is that fine?

Cheers,

Richard





More information about the Openembedded-core mailing list