[OE-core] [PATCH] bitbake.conf: Ignore MACHINE as dep for MACHINEOVERRIDES
Martin Jansa
martin.jansa at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 21:40:07 UTC 2011
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 03:33:35PM -0600, Matthew McClintock wrote:
> This dependency causes binutils to get rebuilt for some of
> our parts that are the same TARGET_ARCH but different
> MACHINE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm at freescale.com>
> ---
> Comments on this? It seems like it might be better to some do this
> in the actual recipes (binutils, gcc-cross, etc) and not globally.
> However, I'm not really sure what goes in MACHINEOVERIDES in
> general and if it could be something that would cause sstate-cache
> to be invalid althogh I could image some scenarios.
>
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index b4335c9..48ae458 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ AUTO_LIBNAME_PKGS = "${PACKAGES}"
> OVERRIDES = "${TARGET_OS}:${TARGET_ARCH}:build-${BUILD_OS}:pn-${PN}:${MACHINEOVERRIDES}:${DISTROOVERRIDES}:forcevariable"
> DISTROOVERRIDES ?= "${DISTRO}"
> MACHINEOVERRIDES ?= "${MACHINE}"
> +MACHINEOVERRIDES[vardepsexclude] += "MACHINE"
>
> CPU_FEATURES ?= ""
> CPU_FEATURES_arm ?= "vfp"
> --
> 1.7.6.1
is this of oe-core/master?
I see similar commit in 362512b83775ad7020e5870a594f0e7ca9ef83ba
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/attachments/20111129/5b2f5c3a/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Openembedded-core
mailing list